FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel 211 vs Nitinol

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel 211 and Nitinol are both nickel alloy grades. Nitinol is the stronger of the two: yield strength 400 MPa (58 ksi) against 210 MPa (30.5 ksi) for Nickel 211, about 90% more; tensile strength follows at 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 480 MPa (69.6 ksi). In exchange, Nickel 211 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 30% for Nitinol, and Nitinol is harder (250 HV vs 115 HV). Nitinol is lighter (6.45 g/cm³ vs 8.72 g/cm³ for Nickel 211) and Nickel 211 is stiffer (205 GPa vs 75 GPa). On the shop floor, Nickel 211 machines more easily (poor vs not recommended), Nickel 211 welds better (very good vs fair), and Nitinol sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than Nickel 211 (high, $$$$).

Nickel 211Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

NitinolChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Nickel 211 vs Nitinol: properties

Nickel 211Nitinol

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

79 GPa11.5 Msi
24 GPa3.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

180 GPa26.1 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.31
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
950 MPa138 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

210 MPa30.5 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
30%

Reduction in Area

65%
—

Shear Strength

330 MPa47.9 ksi
—

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

200 J148 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

110 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

65 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

115 HV
250 HV

Compressive Strength

—
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
40 MPa·√m36.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
22 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.72 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
6.45 g/cm³0.23 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,300°C2,372 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,435°C2,615 °F
1,310°C2,390 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
18 W/m·K10.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

456 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

13.4 µm/m·K7.4 µin/in·°F
11 µm/m·K6.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

290 J/g125 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

315°C599 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

10 % IACS
1.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.72×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.77 µΩ·in
1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.2 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
12 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

22%
10%

Weldability

72 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

—
15 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

170 MJ/kg73,087 BTU/lb
400 MJ/kg171,969 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
26 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
900 L/kg108 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

55 kN·m/kg
147 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.5 MN·m/kg
11.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

108 kJ/m³
1,067 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

10.6 mm²/s
5.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
21

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleNitinolNickel 211

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityNickel 211Nitinol
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—O
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall—1.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Electropolishing—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes

They share 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Nickel 211 vs Nitinol — frequently asked

Is Nitinol stronger than Nickel 211?

Yes. Nitinol has a typical yield strength of 400 MPa (58 ksi) against 210 MPa (30.5 ksi) for Nickel 211 — about 90% more. Tensile strength is 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 480 MPa (69.6 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Nickel 211 or Nitinol?

Nitinol is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Nickel 211 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Nickel 211 or Nitinol?

Nickel 211. Its machinability rates poor (30/100) against not recommended (12/100) for Nitinol; for welding the order is Nickel 211 first (very good, 72/100) then Nitinol (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Nickel 211 and Nitinol side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.