FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 13-8 PH vs 17-4 PH

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 13-8 PH and 17-4 PH are both stainless steel grades, both high strength ss. 13-8 PH is the stronger of the two: yield strength 827 MPa (120 ksi) against 760 MPa (110 ksi) for 17-4 PH, about 9% more. 13-8 PH runs hotter in service (425°C vs 200°C continuous) and 17-4 PH conducts heat better (16.3 W/m·K vs 14 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 17-4 PH machines more easily (fair vs poor) and 17-4 PH sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than 13-8 PH (specialty, $$$$$).

13-8 PHChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

17-4 PHChoose it when the part is machined in volume, or when cost is the deciding factor.

13-8 PH vs 17-4 PH: properties

13-8 PH17-4 PH

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
196 GPa28.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

78 GPa11.3 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

155 GPa22.5 Msi
142 GPa20.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.27

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,000 MPa145 ksi
1,030 MPa149 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

827 MPa120 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Elongation at Break

13%
12%

Reduction in Area

55%
45%

Compressive Strength

850 MPa123 ksi
790 MPa115 ksi

Shear Strength

620 MPa89.9 ksi
660 MPa95.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in
90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

55 J40.6 ft·lbf
35 J25.8 ft·lbf

Same in both: Hardness, Brinell 311 HB · Hardness, Rockwell C 33 HRC · Hardness, Vickers 330 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.76 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.78 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,404°C2,559 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 1,440°C2,624 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

14 W/m·K8.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16.3 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.6 µm/m·K5.9 µin/in·°F
10.8 µm/m·K6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -73°C-99 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.7 % IACS
2.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in
8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
52 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.15 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
48%

Weldability

62 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

28 / 100
35 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
50%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

129 kN·m/kg
132 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.8 MN·m/kg
25.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,710 kJ/m³
1,473 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.9 mm²/s
4.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale13-8 PH17-4 PH

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability13-8 PH17-4 PH
3D printing—Yes
Casting & forging—Yes
Default conditionCondition ACondition A
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm
Electropolished (Metal AM)—Yes
Passivated (Metal AM)—Yes
Plated (Metal AM)—Yes

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. They share 32 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, CrN, DLC, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing and 20 more.

13-8 PH vs 17-4 PH — frequently asked

Is 13-8 PH stronger than 17-4 PH?

Yes. 13-8 PH has a typical yield strength of 827 MPa (120 ksi) against 760 MPa (110 ksi) for 17-4 PH — about 9% more. Tensile strength is 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) vs 1,030 MPa (149 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 13-8 PH or 17-4 PH?

17-4 PH is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 13-8 PH is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 13-8 PH or 17-4 PH?

17-4 PH. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (32/100) for 13-8 PH; for welding the order is 17-4 PH first (very good, 70/100) then 13-8 PH (good, 62/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 13-8 PH and 17-4 PH side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.