FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy Inconel 601 vs Nimonic 90

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy Inconel 601 and Nimonic 90 are both nickel alloy grades. Nimonic 90 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 810 MPa (117 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for Inconel 601, about 161% more; tensile strength follows at 1,240 MPa (180 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi). In exchange, Inconel 601 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 27% for Nimonic 90, and Nimonic 90 is harder (330 HB vs 150 HB). Inconel 601 runs hotter in service (1,150°C vs 920°C continuous). On the shop floor, Inconel 601 machines more easily (poor vs not recommended) and Inconel 601 welds better (very good vs poor).

Inconel 601Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Nimonic 90Choose it when strength drives the design.

Inconel 601 vs Nimonic 90: properties

Inconel 601Nimonic 90

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

206 GPa29.9 Msi
213 GPa30.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

79 GPa11.5 Msi
83 GPa12 Msi

Bulk Modulus

180 GPa26.1 Msi
178 GPa25.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

690 MPa100 ksi
1,240 MPa180 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

310 MPa45 ksi
810 MPa117 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
27%

Reduction in Area

60%
32%

Shear Strength

470 MPa68.2 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

290 MPa42.1 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in
90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

170 J125 ft·lbf
35 J25.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
330 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

80 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

160 HV
350 HV

Compressive Strength

—
830 MPa120 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
35 HRC

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.31

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.11 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
8.19 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,360°C2,480 °F
1,310°C2,390 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,411°C2,572 °F
1,370°C2,498 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

11.2 W/m·K6.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
11.5 W/m·K6.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

448 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
461 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

13.8 µm/m·K7.7 µin/in·°F
12.7 µm/m·K7.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,150°C2,102 °F
920°C1,688 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.5 % IACS
1.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.19×10⁻⁶ Ω·m46.9 µΩ·in
1.18×10⁻⁶ Ω·m46.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
72 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.15 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
14 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

13%
9%

Weldability

78 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

72 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

145 MJ/kg62,339 BTU/lb
240 MJ/kg103,182 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
16 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

85 kN·m/kg
151 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.4 MN·m/kg
26 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

233 kJ/m³
1,540 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.1 mm²/s
3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleInconel 601Nimonic 90

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityInconel 601Nimonic 90
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Inconel 601 vs Nimonic 90 — frequently asked

Is Nimonic 90 stronger than Inconel 601?

Yes. Nimonic 90 has a typical yield strength of 810 MPa (117 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for Inconel 601 — about 161% more. Tensile strength is 1,240 MPa (180 ksi) vs 690 MPa (100 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Inconel 601 or Nimonic 90?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Inconel 601 or Nimonic 90?

Inconel 601. Its machinability rates poor (28/100) against not recommended (14/100) for Nimonic 90; for welding the order is Inconel 601 first (very good, 78/100) then Nimonic 90 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Inconel 601 and Nimonic 90 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.