FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy Inconel 600 vs Nimonic 90

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy Inconel 600 and Nimonic 90 are both nickel alloy grades. Nimonic 90 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 810 MPa (117 ksi) against 255 MPa (37 ksi) for Inconel 600, about 3.2 times as much; tensile strength follows at 1,240 MPa (180 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi). In exchange, Inconel 600 is the more ductile: elongation 42% versus 27% for Nimonic 90, and Nimonic 90 is harder (330 HB vs 150 HB). Nimonic 90 is lighter (8.19 g/cm³ vs 8.47 g/cm³ for Inconel 600) and Inconel 600 runs hotter in service (1,100°C vs 920°C continuous). On the shop floor, Inconel 600 machines more easily (poor vs not recommended) and Inconel 600 welds better (very good vs poor).

Inconel 600Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Nimonic 90Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Inconel 600 vs Nimonic 90: properties

Inconel 600Nimonic 90

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

214 GPa31 Msi
213 GPa30.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
83 GPa12 Msi

Bulk Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
178 GPa25.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.31

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

620 MPa89.9 ksi
1,240 MPa180 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

255 MPa37 ksi
810 MPa117 ksi

Elongation at Break

42%
27%

Reduction in Area

60%
32%

Shear Strength

410 MPa59.5 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

280 MPa40.6 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in
90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

250 J184 ft·lbf
35 J25.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
330 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

78 HRB
—

Compressive Strength

—
830 MPa120 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
35 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

—
350 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.47 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.19 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,354°C2,469 °F
1,310°C2,390 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,413°C2,575 °F
1,370°C2,498 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

14.9 W/m·K8.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
11.5 W/m·K6.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

444 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
461 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

13.3 µm/m·K7.4 µin/in·°F
12.7 µm/m·K7.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

290 J/g125 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,100°C2,012 °F
920°C1,688 °F

Min Service Temperature

-250°C-418 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.7 % IACS
1.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.03×10⁻⁶ Ω·m40.6 µΩ·in
1.18×10⁻⁶ Ω·m46.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.17 V
-0.15 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
14 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

25%
9%

Weldability

80 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

78 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

30 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

65 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb
240 MJ/kg103,182 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

11.5 kg CO₂/kg
16 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

73 kN·m/kg
151 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.3 MN·m/kg
26 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

152 kJ/m³
1,540 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4 mm²/s
3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleInconel 600Nimonic 90

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityInconel 600Nimonic 90
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Inconel 600 vs Nimonic 90 — frequently asked

Is Nimonic 90 stronger than Inconel 600?

Yes. Nimonic 90 has a typical yield strength of 810 MPa (117 ksi) against 255 MPa (37 ksi) for Inconel 600 — about 3.2 times as much. Tensile strength is 1,240 MPa (180 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Inconel 600 or Nimonic 90?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Inconel 600 or Nimonic 90?

Inconel 600. Its machinability rates poor (28/100) against not recommended (14/100) for Nimonic 90; for welding the order is Inconel 600 first (very good, 80/100) then Nimonic 90 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Inconel 600 and Nimonic 90 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.