FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy ENiCrCoMo-1 vs ERNiFeCr-1

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy ENiCrCoMo-1 and ERNiFeCr-1 are both nickel alloy grades. ERNiFeCr-1 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 540 MPa (78.3 ksi) against 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) for ENiCrCoMo-1, about 26% more; tensile strength follows at 860 MPa (125 ksi) vs 720 MPa (104 ksi). In exchange, ENiCrCoMo-1 is the more ductile: elongation 38% versus 28% for ERNiFeCr-1, and ERNiFeCr-1 is harder (245 HB vs 210 HB). ENiCrCoMo-1 is stiffer (211 GPa vs 200 GPa) and ENiCrCoMo-1 runs hotter in service (1,100°C vs 600°C continuous). On the shop floor, ENiCrCoMo-1 welds better (excellent vs very good).

ENiCrCoMo-1Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

ERNiFeCr-1Choose it when strength drives the design.

ENiCrCoMo-1 vs ERNiFeCr-1: properties

ENiCrCoMo-1ERNiFeCr-1

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

211 GPa30.6 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

81 GPa11.7 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

176 GPa25.5 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

720 MPa104 ksi
860 MPa125 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

430 MPa62.4 ksi
540 MPa78.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

38%
28%

Reduction in Area

40%
38%

Compressive Strength

440 MPa63.8 ksi
—

Shear Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in
130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

75 J55.3 ft·lbf
70 J51.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

210 HB
245 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

94 HRB
—

Hardness, Rockwell C

17 HRC
24 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

220 HV
258 HV

Same in both: Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 300 MPa43.5 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.36 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³
8.19 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,332°C2,430 °F
1,260°C2,300 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,380°C2,516 °F
1,336°C2,437 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

13.6 W/m·K7.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
11.4 W/m·K6.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
435 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.6 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
13 µm/m·K7.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

290 J/g125 BTU/lb
227 J/g97.6 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,100°C2,012 °F
600°C1,112 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-253°C-423 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1.22×10⁻⁶ Ω·m48 µΩ·in
1.25×10⁻⁶ Ω·m49.2 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 1.4 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
25 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

12%
14%

Weldability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

175 MJ/kg75,237 BTU/lb
135 MJ/kg58,040 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

14 kg CO₂/kg
13 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

86 kN·m/kg
105 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.2 MN·m/kg
24.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

438 kJ/m³
729 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.9 mm²/s
3.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 4

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleENiCrCoMo-1ERNiFeCr-1

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityENiCrCoMo-1ERNiFeCr-1
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

ENiCrCoMo-1 vs ERNiFeCr-1 — frequently asked

Is ERNiFeCr-1 stronger than ENiCrCoMo-1?

Yes. ERNiFeCr-1 has a typical yield strength of 540 MPa (78.3 ksi) against 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) for ENiCrCoMo-1 — about 26% more. Tensile strength is 860 MPa (125 ksi) vs 720 MPa (104 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ENiCrCoMo-1 or ERNiFeCr-1?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, ENiCrCoMo-1 or ERNiFeCr-1?

ERNiFeCr-1, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 25/100 against 20/100 for ENiCrCoMo-1; for welding the order is ENiCrCoMo-1 first (excellent, 85/100) then ERNiFeCr-1 (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ENiCrCoMo-1 and ERNiFeCr-1 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.