FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy CY-40 vs IN-939

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy CY-40 and IN-939 are both nickel alloy grades. IN-939 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 780 MPa (113 ksi) against 245 MPa (35.5 ksi) for CY-40, about 3.2 times as much; tensile strength follows at 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi). In exchange, CY-40 is the more ductile: elongation 38% versus 5.5% for IN-939, and IN-939 is harder (360 HV vs 152 HV). IN-939 is lighter (8.16 g/cm³ vs 8.45 g/cm³ for CY-40) and CY-40 runs hotter in service (1,000°C vs 850°C continuous). On the shop floor, CY-40 machines more easily (poor vs not recommended) and CY-40 welds better (good vs poor).

CY-40Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

IN-939Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

CY-40 vs IN-939: properties

CY-40IN-939

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
79 GPa11.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
1,100 MPa160 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

245 MPa35.5 ksi
780 MPa113 ksi

Elongation at Break

38%
5.5%

Reduction in Area

40%
7%

Compressive Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
—

Shear Strength

350 MPa50.8 ksi
680 MPa98.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

215 MPa31.2 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in
75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

55 J40.6 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

145 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

78 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

152 HV
360 HV

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
37 HRC

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 175 GPa25.4 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.31

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.45 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.16 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,354°C2,469 °F
1,290°C2,354 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,413°C2,575 °F
1,350°C2,462 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

14.8 W/m·K8.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
10.5 W/m·K6.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

444 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
440 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

13.3 µm/m·K7.4 µin/in·°F
12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

290 J/g125 BTU/lb
285 J/g123 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,000°C1,832 °F
850°C1,562 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.7 % IACS
—

Electrical Resistivity

1.03×10⁻⁶ Ω·m40.6 µΩ·in
1.25×10⁻⁶ Ω·m49.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.18 V
-0.15 V

Corrosion Resistance

76 / 100
80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
12 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

15%
8%

Weldability

60 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
5 / 100

Castability

58 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 55 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb
215 MJ/kg92,433 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
14.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

45%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
135 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.7 MN·m/kg
25.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

150 kJ/m³
1,484 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.9 mm²/s
2.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCY-40IN-939

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCY-40IN-939
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

CY-40 vs IN-939 — frequently asked

Is IN-939 stronger than CY-40?

Yes. IN-939 has a typical yield strength of 780 MPa (113 ksi) against 245 MPa (35.5 ksi) for CY-40 — about 3.2 times as much. Tensile strength is 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CY-40 or IN-939?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, CY-40 or IN-939?

CY-40. Its machinability rates poor (28/100) against not recommended (12/100) for IN-939; for welding the order is CY-40 first (good, 60/100) then IN-939 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CY-40 and IN-939 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.