FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy CX2M vs CY-40

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy CX2M and CY-40 are both nickel alloy grades. CX2M is the stronger of the two: yield strength 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) against 245 MPa (35.5 ksi) for CY-40, about 35% more; tensile strength follows at 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi). CX2M is harder — 190 HB against 145 HB for CY-40 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. CY-40 runs hotter in service (1,000°C vs 550°C continuous) and CY-40 conducts heat better (14.8 W/m·K vs 10.5 W/m·K). On the shop floor, CY-40 machines more easily (28 vs 15 out of 100) and CX2M welds better (very good vs good).

CX2MChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

CY-40Choose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

CX2M vs CY-40: properties

CX2MCY-40

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

78 GPa11.3 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Bulk Modulus

180 GPa26.1 Msi
175 GPa25.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

620 MPa89.9 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

330 MPa47.9 ksi
245 MPa35.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
38%

Reduction in Area

35%
40%

Compressive Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Shear Strength

430 MPa62.4 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in
90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

90 J66.4 ft·lbf
55 J40.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

190 HB
145 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

90 HRB
78 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

10 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

200 HV
152 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.31

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.6 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.45 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,310°C2,390 °F
1,354°C2,469 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,360°C2,480 °F
1,413°C2,575 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

10.5 W/m·K6.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
14.8 W/m·K8.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
444 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.6 µm/m·K7 µin/in·°F
13.3 µm/m·K7.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

550°C1,022 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Latent Heat of Fusion

—
290 J/g125 BTU/lb

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.3 % IACS
1.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.3×10⁻⁶ Ω·m51.2 µΩ·in
1.03×10⁻⁶ Ω·m40.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.18 V

Corrosion Resistance

96 / 100
76 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

15 / 100
28 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

10%
15%

Weldability

80 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

60 / 100
58 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 20 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

230 MJ/kg98,882 BTU/lb
150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

15 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 45%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

72 kN·m/kg
62 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.8 MN·m/kg
23.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

266 kJ/m³
150 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

2.9 mm²/s
3.9 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCY-40CX2M

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCX2MCY-40
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

CX2M vs CY-40 — frequently asked

Is CX2M stronger than CY-40?

Yes. CX2M has a typical yield strength of 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) against 245 MPa (35.5 ksi) for CY-40 — about 35% more. Tensile strength is 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CX2M or CY-40?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, CX2M or CY-40?

CY-40, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 28/100 against 15/100 for CX2M; for welding the order is CX2M first (very good, 80/100) then CY-40 (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CX2M and CY-40 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.