FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy Alumel vs Nitinol

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy Alumel and Nitinol are both nickel alloy grades. Nitinol is the stronger of the two: yield strength 400 MPa (58 ksi) against 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) for Alumel, about 74% more; tensile strength follows at 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 570 MPa (82.7 ksi). Nitinol is harder — 250 HV against 150 HV for Alumel — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Nitinol is lighter (6.45 g/cm³ vs 8.6 g/cm³ for Alumel) and Alumel is stiffer (186 GPa vs 75 GPa). On the shop floor, Alumel machines more easily (poor vs not recommended), Alumel welds better (good vs fair), and Alumel forms better (very good vs fair).

AlumelChoose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

NitinolChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Alumel vs Nitinol: properties

AlumelNitinol

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

186 GPa27 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
24 GPa3.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

155 GPa22.5 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

570 MPa82.7 ksi
950 MPa138 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Elongation at Break

32%
30%

Shear Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
—

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

135 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

75 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

150 HV
250 HV

Compressive Strength

—
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
40 MPa·√m36.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
22 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.6 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
6.45 g/cm³0.23 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,399°C2,550 °F
1,300°C2,372 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,430°C2,606 °F
1,310°C2,390 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

29.7 W/m·K17.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
18 W/m·K10.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

523 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.9 µm/m·K7.2 µin/in·°F
11 µm/m·K6.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

290 J/g125 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,100°C2,012 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

5.9 % IACS
1.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.94×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11.6 µΩ·in
1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
82 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.25 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
12 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
10%

Weldability

60 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
20 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
15 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

160 MJ/kg68,788 BTU/lb
400 MJ/kg171,969 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

11.5 kg CO₂/kg
26 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
900 L/kg108 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

66 kN·m/kg
147 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

21.6 MN·m/kg
11.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

142 kJ/m³
1,067 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

6.6 mm²/s
5.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
21

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleNitinolAlumel

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlumelNitinol
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—O
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall—1.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Electropolishing—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes

They share 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Alumel vs Nitinol — frequently asked

Is Nitinol stronger than Alumel?

Yes. Nitinol has a typical yield strength of 400 MPa (58 ksi) against 230 MPa (33.4 ksi) for Alumel — about 74% more. Tensile strength is 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 570 MPa (82.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Alumel or Nitinol?

Nitinol is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Alumel is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Alumel or Nitinol?

Alumel. Its machinability rates poor (30/100) against not recommended (12/100) for Nitinol; for welding the order is Alumel first (good, 60/100) then Nitinol (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Alumel and Nitinol side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.