FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy Alloy 22 vs Alloy 31

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy Alloy 22 and Alloy 31 are both nickel alloy grades. Alloy 22 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 400 MPa (58 ksi) against 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) for Alloy 31, about 18% more; tensile strength follows at 800 MPa (116 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi). Alloy 22 is the more ductile: elongation 62% versus 50% for Alloy 31, and Alloy 22 is harder (200 HB vs 180 HB). Alloy 31 is lighter (8.02 g/cm³ vs 8.69 g/cm³ for Alloy 22) and Alloy 22 is stiffer (206 GPa vs 195 GPa). On the shop floor, Alloy 22 welds better (excellent vs very good).

Alloy 22Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Alloy 31Choose it when weight is the constraint.

Alloy 22 vs Alloy 31: properties

Alloy 22Alloy 31

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

206 GPa29.9 Msi
195 GPa28.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

155 GPa22.5 Msi
163 GPa23.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

800 MPa116 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

400 MPa58 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

62%
50%

Compressive Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
—

Shear Strength

520 MPa75.4 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

340 MPa49.3 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

250 J184 ft·lbf
200 J148 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

200 HB
180 HB

Hardness, Vickers

210 HV
190 HV

Same in both: Reduction in Area 65% · Hardness, Rockwell B 88 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.69 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.02 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,357°C2,475 °F
1,320°C2,408 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,399°C2,550 °F
1,360°C2,480 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

10.1 W/m·K5.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
11 W/m·K6.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

414 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
450 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.4 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F
14.5 µm/m·K8.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

675°C1,247 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 285 J/g123 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.5 % IACS
1.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.14×10⁻⁶ Ω·m44.9 µΩ·in
1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.08 V
-0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

93 / 100
92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

15 / 100
22 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

12%
14%

Weldability

85 / 100
72 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
78 / 100

Same in both: Castability 35 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

145 MJ/kg62,339 BTU/lb
95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
7.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

92 kN·m/kg
87 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.7 MN·m/kg
24.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

388 kJ/m³
296 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

2.8 mm²/s
3 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAlloy 22Alloy 31

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlloy 22Alloy 31
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Alloy 22 vs Alloy 31 — frequently asked

Is Alloy 22 stronger than Alloy 31?

Yes. Alloy 22 has a typical yield strength of 400 MPa (58 ksi) against 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) for Alloy 31 — about 18% more. Tensile strength is 800 MPa (116 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Alloy 22 or Alloy 31?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Alloy 22 or Alloy 31?

Alloy 31, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 22/100 against 15/100 for Alloy 22; for welding the order is Alloy 22 first (excellent, 85/100) then Alloy 31 (very good, 72/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Alloy 22 and Alloy 31 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.