FabDigitFabDigit

Redwood vs SPF

Natural Material · grade comparison

Redwood and SPF are both natural material grades. Redwood is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) against 22 MPa (3.19 ksi) for SPF, about 3.2 times as much. On the shop floor, SPF sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than Redwood (standard, $$).

RedwoodChoose it when strength drives the design.

SPFChoose it when cost is the deciding factor.

Redwood vs SPF: properties

RedwoodSPF

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

9.6 GPa1.4 Msi
9.7 GPa1.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
0.7 GPa0.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.36
0.37

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Compressive Strength

42 MPa6.1 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Flexural Strength

69 MPa10 ksi
35 MPa5.1 ksi

Same in both: Elongation at Break 1% · Shear Strength 7 MPa0.94 ksi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 0.4 MPa·√m0.36 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Porosity

72%
70%

Same in both: Density 0.42 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.11 W/m·K0.06 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.12 W/m·K0.07 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F
1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

3.5 µm/m·K1.9 µin/in·°F
4.5 µm/m·K2.5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

70°C158 °F
65°C149 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in
5×10⁹ Ω·m1.97×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
95 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

9 MJ/kg3,869 BTU/lb
9 MJ/kg3,654 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

0.45 kg CO₂/kg
0.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
550 L/kg65.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

8%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

167 kN·m/kg
52 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

22.9 MN·m/kg
23 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every natural material grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityRedwoodSPF
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Redwood vs SPF — frequently asked

Is Redwood stronger than SPF?

Yes. Redwood has a typical tensile strength of 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) against 22 MPa (3.19 ksi) for SPF — about 3.2 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Redwood or SPF?

SPF is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while Redwood is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Redwood or SPF?

SPF, by a small margin. Both rate excellent for machinability — 95/100 against 90/100 for Redwood.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Redwood and SPF side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.