FabDigitFabDigit

Radiata Pine vs SPF

Natural Material · grade comparison

Radiata Pine and SPF are both natural material grades. Radiata Pine is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) against 22 MPa (3.19 ksi) for SPF, about 4.1 times as much. SPF is lighter (0.42 g/cm³ vs 0.48 g/cm³ for Radiata Pine) and Radiata Pine is stiffer (10.2 GPa vs 9.7 GPa).

Radiata PineChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

SPFChoose it when weight is the constraint.

Radiata Pine vs SPF: properties

Radiata PineSPF

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

10.2 GPa1.5 Msi
9.7 GPa1.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Compressive Strength

42 MPa6.1 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Flexural Strength

81 MPa11.7 ksi
35 MPa5.1 ksi

Shear Strength

12 MPa1.7 ksi
7 MPa0.94 ksi

Same in both: Shear Modulus 0.7 GPa0.1 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.37 · Elongation at Break 1% · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 0.4 MPa·√m0.36 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.48 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³
0.42 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³

Porosity

68%
70%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

4 µm/m·K2.2 µin/in·°F
4.5 µm/m·K2.5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
65°C149 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.12 W/m·K0.07 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in
5×10⁹ Ω·m1.97×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

3 kV/mm76.2 V/mil
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

22 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
95 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

9 MJ/kg3,869 BTU/lb
9 MJ/kg3,654 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

0.3 kg CO₂/kg
0.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
550 L/kg65.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

188 kN·m/kg
52 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

21.3 MN·m/kg
23 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every natural material grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityRadiata PineSPF
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Radiata Pine vs SPF — frequently asked

Is Radiata Pine stronger than SPF?

Yes. Radiata Pine has a typical tensile strength of 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) against 22 MPa (3.19 ksi) for SPF — about 4.1 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Radiata Pine or SPF?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Radiata Pine or SPF?

SPF, by a small margin. Both rate excellent for machinability — 95/100 against 90/100 for Radiata Pine.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Radiata Pine and SPF side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.