FabDigitFabDigit

Douglas Fir vs SPF

Natural Material · grade comparison

Douglas Fir and SPF are both natural material grades. Douglas Fir is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) against 22 MPa (3.19 ksi) for SPF, about 4.8 times as much. SPF is lighter (0.42 g/cm³ vs 0.48 g/cm³ for Douglas Fir) and Douglas Fir is stiffer (13.4 GPa vs 9.7 GPa). On the shop floor, SPF machines more easily (excellent vs very good).

Douglas FirChoose it when strength drives the design.

SPFChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

Douglas Fir vs SPF: properties

Douglas FirSPF

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

13.4 GPa1.9 Msi
9.7 GPa1.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.86 GPa0.12 Msi
0.7 GPa0.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.37

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

105 MPa15.2 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Compressive Strength

50 MPa7.3 ksi
30 MPa4.4 ksi

Flexural Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
35 MPa5.1 ksi

Shear Strength

8 MPa1.1 ksi
7 MPa0.94 ksi

Hardness, Mohs

2.5
—

Same in both: Elongation at Break 1% · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 0.4 MPa·√m0.36 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.48 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³
0.42 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³

Porosity

68%
70%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F
1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

4 µm/m·K2.2 µin/in·°F
4.5 µm/m·K2.5 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.12 W/m·K0.07 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 65°C149 °F · Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in
5×10⁹ Ω·m1.97×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

5 kV/mm127 V/mil
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

50 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
95 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

10 MJ/kg4,299 BTU/lb
9 MJ/kg3,654 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

0.35 kg CO₂/kg
0.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
550 L/kg65.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

219 kN·m/kg
52 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.9 MN·m/kg
23 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every natural material grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityDouglas FirSPF
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Douglas Fir vs SPF — frequently asked

Is Douglas Fir stronger than SPF?

Yes. Douglas Fir has a typical tensile strength of 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) against 22 MPa (3.19 ksi) for SPF — about 4.8 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Douglas Fir or SPF?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Douglas Fir or SPF?

SPF. Its machinability rates excellent (95/100) against very good (80/100) for Douglas Fir.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Douglas Fir and SPF side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.