FabDigitFabDigit

Douglas Fir vs Redwood

Natural Material · grade comparison

Douglas Fir and Redwood are both natural material grades. Douglas Fir is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for Redwood, about 50% more. Redwood is lighter (0.42 g/cm³ vs 0.48 g/cm³ for Douglas Fir) and Douglas Fir is stiffer (13.4 GPa vs 9.6 GPa). On the shop floor, Redwood machines more easily (excellent vs very good) and Douglas Fir sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than Redwood (standard, $$).

Douglas FirChoose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

RedwoodChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

Douglas Fir vs Redwood: properties

Douglas FirRedwood

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

13.4 GPa1.9 Msi
9.6 GPa1.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.86 GPa0.12 Msi
0.85 GPa0.12 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.36

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

105 MPa15.2 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Compressive Strength

50 MPa7.3 ksi
42 MPa6.1 ksi

Flexural Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
69 MPa10 ksi

Shear Strength

8 MPa1.1 ksi
7 MPa0.94 ksi

Hardness, Mohs

2.5
—

Same in both: Elongation at Break 1% · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 0.4 MPa·√m0.36 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.48 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³
0.42 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³

Porosity

68%
72%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.12 W/m·K0.07 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.11 W/m·K0.06 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F
1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

4 µm/m·K2.2 µin/in·°F
3.5 µm/m·K1.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

65°C149 °F
70°C158 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

5 kV/mm127 V/mil
—

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

50 / 100
80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

10 MJ/kg4,299 BTU/lb
9 MJ/kg3,869 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

0.35 kg CO₂/kg
0.45 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

5%
8%

Same in both: Embodied Water 500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

219 kN·m/kg
167 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.9 MN·m/kg
22.9 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every natural material grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityDouglas FirRedwood
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Douglas Fir vs Redwood — frequently asked

Is Douglas Fir stronger than Redwood?

Yes. Douglas Fir has a typical tensile strength of 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for Redwood — about 50% more.

Which is cheaper, Douglas Fir or Redwood?

Douglas Fir is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while Redwood is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Douglas Fir or Redwood?

Redwood. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (80/100) for Douglas Fir.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Douglas Fir and Redwood side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.