FabDigitFabDigit

Douglas Fir vs Radiata Pine

Natural Material · grade comparison

Douglas Fir and Radiata Pine are both natural material grades. Douglas Fir is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for Radiata Pine, about 17% more. Douglas Fir is stiffer (13.4 GPa vs 10.2 GPa) and Radiata Pine runs hotter in service (80°C vs 65°C continuous). On the shop floor, Radiata Pine machines more easily (excellent vs very good).

Douglas FirChoose it when strength drives the design.

Radiata PineChoose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

Douglas Fir vs Radiata Pine: properties

Douglas FirRadiata Pine

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

13.4 GPa1.9 Msi
10.2 GPa1.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.86 GPa0.12 Msi
0.7 GPa0.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.37

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

105 MPa15.2 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Compressive Strength

50 MPa7.3 ksi
42 MPa6.1 ksi

Flexural Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
81 MPa11.7 ksi

Shear Strength

8 MPa1.1 ksi
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Hardness, Mohs

2.5
—

Same in both: Elongation at Break 1% · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 0.4 MPa·√m0.36 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 0.48 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³ · Porosity 68%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F
1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

65°C149 °F
80°C176 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.12 W/m·K0.07 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 4 µm/m·K2.2 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

5 kV/mm127 V/mil
3 kV/mm76.2 V/mil

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

50 / 100
22 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

10 MJ/kg4,299 BTU/lb
9 MJ/kg3,869 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

0.35 kg CO₂/kg
0.3 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Same in both: Embodied Water 500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

219 kN·m/kg
188 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.9 MN·m/kg
21.3 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every natural material grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityDouglas FirRadiata Pine
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Douglas Fir vs Radiata Pine — frequently asked

Is Douglas Fir stronger than Radiata Pine?

Yes. Douglas Fir has a typical tensile strength of 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for Radiata Pine — about 17% more.

Which is cheaper, Douglas Fir or Radiata Pine?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Douglas Fir or Radiata Pine?

Radiata Pine. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (80/100) for Douglas Fir.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Douglas Fir and Radiata Pine side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.