FabDigitFabDigit

Maple vs Teak

Natural Material · grade comparison

Maple and Teak are both natural material grades. Maple is the more ductile: elongation 1.5% versus 1% for Teak. Teak is lighter (0.65 g/cm³ vs 0.71 g/cm³ for Maple). On the shop floor, Maple sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Teak (premium, $$$).

MapleChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

TeakChoose it when weight is the constraint.

Maple vs Teak: properties

MapleTeak

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

12.6 GPa1.8 Msi
12.3 GPa1.8 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
1 GPa0.15 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.42
0.4

Elongation at Break

1.5%
1%

Compressive Strength

54 MPa7.8 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Flexural Strength

109 MPa15.8 ksi
97 MPa14.1 ksi

Shear Strength

16 MPa2.3 ksi
13 MPa1.9 ksi

Same in both: Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 100 MPa14.5 ksi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 0.6 MPa·√m0.55 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.71 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.65 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³

Porosity

55%
57%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,650 J/kg·K0.39 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

4 µm/m·K2.2 µin/in·°F
4.5 µm/m·K2.5 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 90°C194 °F · Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10⁸ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁵ µΩ·in
3×10⁹ Ω·m1.18×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

4 kV/mm102 V/mil
2.5 kV/mm63.5 V/mil

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

68 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

88 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

10 MJ/kg4,299 BTU/lb
12 MJ/kg5,159 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

0.45 kg CO₂/kg
0.65 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

650 L/kg77.9 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

142 kN·m/kg
154 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

17.9 MN·m/kg
18.9 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every natural material grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMapleTeak
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Maple vs Teak — frequently asked

What is the difference between Maple and Teak?

Maple and Teak are both natural material grades. Maple is the more ductile: elongation 1.5% versus 1% for Teak. Teak is lighter (0.65 g/cm³ vs 0.71 g/cm³ for Maple).

Which is cheaper, Maple or Teak?

Maple is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Teak is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose Maple over Teak?

Pick Maple when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor. Pick Teak when weight is the constraint.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Maple and Teak side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.