FabDigitFabDigit

Birch vs Teak

Natural Material · grade comparison

Birch and Teak are both natural material grades. Birch is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for Teak, about 15% more. Birch is the more ductile: elongation 1.5% versus 1% for Teak. Birch is stiffer (13.9 GPa vs 12.3 GPa). On the shop floor, Birch machines more easily (very good vs good) and Birch sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than Teak (premium, $$$).

BirchChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Birch vs Teak: properties

BirchTeak

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

13.9 GPa2 Msi
12.3 GPa1.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.43
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

1.5%
1%

Compressive Strength

56 MPa8.1 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Flexural Strength

114 MPa16.5 ksi
97 MPa14.1 ksi

Same in both: Shear Modulus 1 GPa0.15 Msi · Shear Strength 13 MPa1.9 ksi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 0.6 MPa·√m0.55 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 0.65 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³ · Porosity 57%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.15 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

4 µm/m·K2.2 µin/in·°F
4.5 µm/m·K2.5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

95°C203 °F
90°C194 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in
3×10⁹ Ω·m1.18×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

2 kV/mm50.8 V/mil
2.5 kV/mm63.5 V/mil

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

30 / 100
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

11 MJ/kg4,729 BTU/lb
12 MJ/kg5,159 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

0.45 kg CO₂/kg
0.65 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

600 L/kg71.9 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

177 kN·m/kg
154 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

21.4 MN·m/kg
18.9 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every natural material grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityBirchTeak
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Birch vs Teak — frequently asked

Is Birch stronger than Teak?

Yes. Birch has a typical tensile strength of 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for Teak — about 15% more.

Which is cheaper, Birch or Teak?

Birch is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while Teak is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Birch or Teak?

Birch. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against good (65/100) for Teak.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Birch and Teak side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.