FabDigitFabDigit

Birch vs Maple

Natural Material · grade comparison

Birch and Maple are both natural material grades. Birch is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for Maple, about 15% more. Birch is lighter (0.65 g/cm³ vs 0.71 g/cm³ for Maple) and Birch is stiffer (13.9 GPa vs 12.6 GPa). On the shop floor, Birch sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than Maple (standard, $$).

BirchChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Birch vs Maple: properties

BirchMaple

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

13.9 GPa2 Msi
12.6 GPa1.8 Msi

Shear Modulus

1 GPa0.15 Msi
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.43
0.42

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Compressive Strength

56 MPa8.1 ksi
54 MPa7.8 ksi

Flexural Strength

114 MPa16.5 ksi
109 MPa15.8 ksi

Shear Strength

13 MPa1.9 ksi
16 MPa2.3 ksi

Same in both: Elongation at Break 1.5% · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 0.6 MPa·√m0.55 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.65 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³
0.71 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Porosity

57%
55%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.15 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F
1,650 J/kg·K0.39 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

95°C203 °F
90°C194 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 4 µm/m·K2.2 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in
1×10⁸ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁵ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

2 kV/mm50.8 V/mil
4 kV/mm102 V/mil

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

30 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
68 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
88 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

11 MJ/kg4,729 BTU/lb
10 MJ/kg4,299 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

600 L/kg71.9 gal/lb
650 L/kg77.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 0.45 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

177 kN·m/kg
142 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

21.4 MN·m/kg
17.9 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every natural material grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityBirchMaple
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Birch vs Maple — frequently asked

Is Birch stronger than Maple?

Yes. Birch has a typical tensile strength of 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for Maple — about 15% more.

Which is cheaper, Birch or Maple?

Birch is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while Maple is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Birch or Maple?

Birch. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against good (68/100) for Maple.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Birch and Maple side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.