FabDigitFabDigit

Ash vs Maple

Natural Material · grade comparison

Ash and Maple are both natural material grades. Ash is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for Maple, about 10% more. In exchange, Maple is the more ductile: elongation 1.5% versus 1% for Ash. Ash is lighter (0.67 g/cm³ vs 0.71 g/cm³ for Maple) and Maple runs hotter in service (90°C vs 80°C continuous).

AshChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

MapleChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Ash vs Maple: properties

AshMaple

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

12 GPa1.7 Msi
12.6 GPa1.8 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.95 GPa0.14 Msi
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.37
0.42

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

110 MPa16 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

1%
1.5%

Compressive Strength

51 MPa7.4 ksi
54 MPa7.8 ksi

Flexural Strength

103 MPa14.9 ksi
109 MPa15.8 ksi

Shear Strength

13 MPa1.9 ksi
16 MPa2.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.5 MPa·√m0.46 ksi·√in
0.6 MPa·√m0.55 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.67 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³
0.71 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Same in both: Porosity 55%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F
1,650 J/kg·K0.39 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

30 µm/m·K16.7 µin/in·°F
4 µm/m·K2.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
90°C194 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

3 kV/mm76.2 V/mil
4 kV/mm102 V/mil

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10⁸ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁵ µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
68 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
88 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

11 MJ/kg4,729 BTU/lb
10 MJ/kg4,299 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

0.5 kg CO₂/kg
0.45 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 650 L/kg77.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

164 kN·m/kg
142 kN·m/kg

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 17.9 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every natural material grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAshMaple
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Ash vs Maple — frequently asked

Is Ash stronger than Maple?

Yes. Ash has a typical tensile strength of 110 MPa (16 ksi) against 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) for Maple — about 10% more.

Which is cheaper, Ash or Maple?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose Ash over Maple?

Pick Ash when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint. Pick Maple when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Ash and Maple side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.