FabDigitFabDigit

Birch vs Oak

Natural Material · grade comparison

Birch and Oak are both natural material grades. Birch is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) for Oak, about 21% more. Birch is the more ductile: elongation 1.5% versus 1% for Oak. Birch is lighter (0.65 g/cm³ vs 0.72 g/cm³ for Oak) and Birch is stiffer (13.9 GPa vs 12.3 GPa). On the shop floor, Birch sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than Oak (standard, $$).

BirchChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Birch vs Oak: properties

BirchOak

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

13.9 GPa2 Msi
12.3 GPa1.8 Msi

Shear Modulus

1 GPa0.15 Msi
1.1 GPa0.16 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.43
0.37

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

1.5%
1%

Compressive Strength

56 MPa8.1 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Flexural Strength

114 MPa16.5 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Shear Strength

13 MPa1.9 ksi
14 MPa2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.6 MPa·√m0.55 ksi·√in
0.5 MPa·√m0.46 ksi·√in

Hardness, Mohs

—
2.5

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.65 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³
0.72 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Porosity

57%
52%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.15 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F
1,650 J/kg·K0.39 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

4 µm/m·K2.2 µin/in·°F
4.5 µm/m·K2.5 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

95°C203 °F
90°C194 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

2 kV/mm50.8 V/mil
4 kV/mm102 V/mil

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

30 / 100
50 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

0.45 kg CO₂/kg
0.55 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

600 L/kg71.9 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 11 MJ/kg4,729 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

177 kN·m/kg
132 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

21.4 MN·m/kg
17.1 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every natural material grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityBirchOak
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Birch vs Oak — frequently asked

Is Birch stronger than Oak?

Yes. Birch has a typical tensile strength of 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) for Oak — about 21% more.

Which is cheaper, Birch or Oak?

Birch is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while Oak is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Birch or Oak?

Birch, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 75/100 against 70/100 for Oak.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Birch and Oak side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.