FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C96400 vs CC380H

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C96400 and CC380H are both copper alloy grades. C96400 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for CC380H, about 89% more; tensile strength follows at 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi). C96400 is harder — 140 HB against 80 HB for CC380H — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. C96400 is stiffer (152 GPa vs 124 GPa) and CC380H conducts heat better (42 W/m·K vs 28 W/m·K).

C96400Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

C96400 vs CC380H: properties

C96400CC380H

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

152 GPa22 Msi
124 GPa18 Msi

Shear Modulus

57 GPa8.3 Msi
46 GPa6.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

149 GPa21.6 Msi
128 GPa18.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

265 MPa38.4 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Shear Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

150 MPa21.8 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

45 J33.2 ft·lbf
50 J36.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

140 HB
80 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

77 HRB
40 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

145 HV
84 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Elongation at Break 25% · Reduction in Area 25%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.9 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,171°C2,140 °F
1,100°C2,012 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,238°C2,260 °F
1,145°C2,093 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

28 W/m·K16.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16 µm/m·K8.9 µin/in·°F
16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb
200 J/g86 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 300°C572 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

4.5 % IACS
10 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m15 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
28 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Weldability 80 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 70 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb
70 MJ/kg30,095 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

54 kN·m/kg
34 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

17 MN·m/kg
13.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

231 kJ/m³
79 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

8.3 mm²/s
12.5 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 6

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCC380HC96400

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC96400CC380H
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C96400 vs CC380H — frequently asked

Is C96400 stronger than CC380H?

Yes. C96400 has a typical yield strength of 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for CC380H — about 89% more. Tensile strength is 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C96400 or CC380H?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose C96400 over CC380H?

Pick C96400 when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C96400 and CC380H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.