FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C95500 vs CC494K

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C95500 and CC494K are both copper alloy grades. C95500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) for CC494K, about 186% more; tensile strength follows at 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 220 MPa (31.9 ksi). In exchange, CC494K is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 8% for C95500, and C95500 is harder (192 HB vs 68 HB). C95500 is lighter (7.53 g/cm³ vs 8.9 g/cm³ for CC494K) and C95500 is stiffer (110 GPa vs 80 GPa). On the shop floor, CC494K machines more easily (excellent vs fair), C95500 welds better (good vs not recommended), and CC494K sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C95500 (specialty, $$$$$).

C95500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

CC494KChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C95500 vs CC494K: properties

C95500CC494K

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

42 GPa6.1 Msi
30 GPa4.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

102 GPa14.8 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

700 MPa102 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
10%

Shear Strength

425 MPa61.6 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
72 MPa10.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
11 J8.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

192 HB
68 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

92 HRB
24 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
14%

Compressive Strength

—
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Hardness, Vickers

—
72 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³
8.9 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,054°C1,929 °F
855°C1,571 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,064°C1,947 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
71 W/m·K41 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F
18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb
170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8.5 % IACS
15 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.03×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.99 µΩ·in
1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.26 V

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
60 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
90 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
82%

Weldability

60 / 100
12 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
8 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
82 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
4 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

40%
60%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

93 kN·m/kg
25 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

14.6 MN·m/kg
9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

409 kJ/m³
69 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.3 mm²/s
21.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
11

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC95500CC494K

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC95500CC494K
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C95500 vs CC494K — frequently asked

Is C95500 stronger than CC494K?

Yes. C95500 has a typical yield strength of 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) for CC494K — about 186% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 220 MPa (31.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C95500 or CC494K?

CC494K is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C95500 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C95500 or CC494K?

CC494K. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against fair (40/100) for C95500; for welding the order is C95500 first (good, 60/100) then CC494K (not recommended, 12/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C95500 and CC494K side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.