FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C95500 vs C99600

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C95500 and C99600 are both copper alloy grades. C95500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 193 MPa (28 ksi) for C99600, about 55% more; tensile strength follows at 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 434 MPa (62.9 ksi). In exchange, C99600 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 8% for C95500, and C95500 is harder (192 HB vs 115 HB). C95500 is stiffer (110 GPa vs 96 GPa) and C95500 runs hotter in service (300°C vs 150°C continuous). On the shop floor, C95500 machines more easily (fair vs poor), C95500 welds better (good vs fair), and C99600 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C95500 (specialty, $$$$$).

C95500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C99600Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

C95500 vs C99600: properties

C95500C99600

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
96 GPa13.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

42 GPa6.1 Msi
36 GPa5.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

102 GPa14.8 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

700 MPa102 ksi
434 MPa62.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
193 MPa28 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
20%

Shear Strength

425 MPa61.6 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

192 HB
115 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

92 HRB
68 HRB

Compressive Strength

—
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³
7.5 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,054°C1,929 °F
900°C1,652 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,064°C1,947 °F
945°C1,733 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16 W/m·K9.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F
18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb
215 J/g92.4 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8.5 % IACS
2.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.03×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.99 µΩ·in
6.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m27.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.4 V

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
30%

Weldability

60 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

93 kN·m/kg
58 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

14.6 MN·m/kg
12.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

409 kJ/m³
194 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.3 mm²/s
5.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
4

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC95500C99600

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC95500C99600
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C95500 vs C99600 — frequently asked

Is C95500 stronger than C99600?

Yes. C95500 has a typical yield strength of 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 193 MPa (28 ksi) for C99600 — about 55% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 434 MPa (62.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C95500 or C99600?

C99600 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C95500 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C95500 or C99600?

C95500. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (30/100) for C99600; for welding the order is C95500 first (good, 60/100) then C99600 (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C95500 and C99600 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.