FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84800 vs C99600

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84800 and C99600 are both copper alloy grades. C99600 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 193 MPa (28 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for C84800, about 56% more; tensile strength follows at 434 MPa (62.9 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi). In exchange, C84800 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 20% for C99600, and C99600 is harder (115 HB vs 55 HB). C99600 is lighter (7.5 g/cm³ vs 8.55 g/cm³ for C84800) and C99600 is stiffer (96 GPa vs 86 GPa). On the shop floor, C84800 machines more easily (excellent vs poor), C99600 welds better (fair vs poor), and C99600 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84800 (specialty, $$$$$).

C84800Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C99600Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C84800 vs C99600: properties

C84800C99600

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

86 GPa12.5 Msi
96 GPa13.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

32 GPa4.6 Msi
36 GPa5.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

262 MPa38 ksi
434 MPa62.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
193 MPa28 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
20%

Shear Strength

190 MPa27.6 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
115 HB

Compressive Strength

—
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
68 HRB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 105 GPa15.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.55 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
7.5 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
900°C1,652 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,010°C1,850 °F
945°C1,733 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16 W/m·K9.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
215 J/g92.4 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16 % IACS
2.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.08×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.25 µΩ·in
6.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m27.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.4 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

88 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
40 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
30%

Formability (cold)

—
25 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

31 kN·m/kg
58 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.1 MN·m/kg
12.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

89 kJ/m³
194 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

22.3 mm²/s
5.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
4

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84800C99600

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84800C99600
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84800 vs C99600 — frequently asked

Is C99600 stronger than C84800?

Yes. C99600 has a typical yield strength of 193 MPa (28 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for C84800 — about 56% more. Tensile strength is 434 MPa (62.9 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C84800 or C99600?

C99600 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84800 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C84800 or C99600?

C84800. Its machinability rates excellent (88/100) against poor (30/100) for C99600; for welding the order is C99600 first (fair, 40/100) then C84800 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84800 and C99600 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.