FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C95500 vs C95800

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C95500 and C95800 are both copper alloy grades. C95500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for C95800, about 9% more; tensile strength follows at 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 655 MPa (95 ksi). In exchange, C95800 is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 8% for C95500, and C95500 is harder (192 HB vs 159 HB). C95500 conducts electricity better (8.5 % IACS vs 7 % IACS). On the shop floor, C95500 machines more easily (fair vs poor), C95800 welds better (very good vs good), and C95800 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C95500 (specialty, $$$$$).

C95500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

C95800Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

C95500 vs C95800: properties

C95500C95800

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

42 GPa6.1 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

102 GPa14.8 Msi
106 GPa15.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

700 MPa102 ksi
655 MPa95 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
22%

Shear Strength

425 MPa61.6 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

192 HB
159 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

92 HRB
84 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
20%

Hardness, Vickers

—
167 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.32 · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 240 MPa34.8 ksi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³
7.64 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,054°C1,929 °F
1,043°C1,909 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,064°C1,947 °F
1,060°C1,940 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Latent Heat of Fusion

210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb
—

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 300°C572 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8.5 % IACS
7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.03×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.99 µΩ·in
2.46×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
84 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.28 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
30%

Weldability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
78 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 30 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb
65 MJ/kg27,945 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

93 kN·m/kg
86 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

14.6 MN·m/kg
15.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

409 kJ/m³
329 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.3 mm²/s
13.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
15

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC95500C95800

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC95500C95800
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C95500 vs C95800 — frequently asked

Is C95500 stronger than C95800?

Yes. C95500 has a typical yield strength of 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for C95800 — about 9% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 655 MPa (95 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C95500 or C95800?

C95800 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C95500 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C95500 or C95800?

C95500. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (30/100) for C95800; for welding the order is C95800 first (very good, 70/100) then C95500 (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C95500 and C95800 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.