FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84400 vs C95800

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84400 and C95800 are both copper alloy grades. C95800 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400, about 150% more; tensile strength follows at 655 MPa (95 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi). In exchange, C84400 is the more ductile: elongation 26% versus 22% for C95800, and C95800 is harder (159 HB vs 55 HB). C95800 is lighter (7.64 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C84400) and C95800 is stiffer (115 GPa vs 95 GPa). On the shop floor, C84400 machines more easily (excellent vs poor), C95800 welds better (very good vs poor), and C95800 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84400 (specialty, $$$$$).

C84400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C95800Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C84400 vs C95800: properties

C84400C95800

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
106 GPa15.4 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
655 MPa95 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

26%
22%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
—

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
159 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
84 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
20%

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

—
167 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
7.64 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
1,043°C1,909 °F

Liquidus Temperature

954°C1,749 °F
1,060°C1,940 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16.4 % IACS
7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.05×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.13 µΩ·in
2.46×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
84 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.28 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
30%

Weldability

20 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
78 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

42 MJ/kg18,057 BTU/lb
65 MJ/kg27,945 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
86 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.8 MN·m/kg
15.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

64 kJ/m³
329 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

21.7 mm²/s
13.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
15

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84400C95800

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84400C95800
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84400 vs C95800 — frequently asked

Is C95800 stronger than C84400?

Yes. C95800 has a typical yield strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400 — about 150% more. Tensile strength is 655 MPa (95 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C84400 or C95800?

C95800 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84400 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C84400 or C95800?

C84400. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against poor (30/100) for C95800; for welding the order is C95800 first (very good, 70/100) then C84400 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84400 and C95800 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.