FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C93200 vs C95500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C93200 and C95500 are both copper alloy grades. C95500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) for C93200, about 140% more; tensile strength follows at 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 240 MPa (34.8 ksi). In exchange, C93200 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 8% for C95500, and C95500 is harder (192 HB vs 65 HB). C95500 is lighter (7.53 g/cm³ vs 8.93 g/cm³ for C93200) and C95500 is stiffer (110 GPa vs 100 GPa). On the shop floor, C93200 machines more easily (very good vs fair), C95500 welds better (good vs poor), and C93200 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than C95500 (specialty, $$$$$).

C93200Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C95500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C93200 vs C95500: properties

C93200C95500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

100 GPa14.5 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

37 GPa5.4 Msi
42 GPa6.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
102 GPa14.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
8%

Reduction in Area

16%
—

Shear Strength

170 MPa24.7 ksi
425 MPa61.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

11 J8.1 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
192 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

24 HRB
92 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

68 HV
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.93 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

854°C1,569 °F
1,054°C1,929 °F

Liquidus Temperature

949°C1,740 °F
1,064°C1,947 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

59 W/m·K34.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

190 J/g81.7 BTU/lb
210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

230°C446 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

12 % IACS
8.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.44×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.67 µΩ·in
2.03×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.99 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.28 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

78 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

130%
50%

Weldability

15 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

8 / 100
15 / 100

Castability

88 / 100
75 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

85%
40%

Same in both: Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
93 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

11.2 MN·m/kg
14.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

78 kJ/m³
409 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

17.5 mm²/s
13.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

8
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC95500C93200

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC93200C95500
Casting & forgingYes—
Default conditionAs CastAs Cast
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 9 finishes: Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Gold Plating, Nickel Plating, Painting, Silver Plating, Tin Plating.

C93200 vs C95500 — frequently asked

Is C95500 stronger than C93200?

Yes. C95500 has a typical yield strength of 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) for C93200 — about 140% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 240 MPa (34.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C93200 or C95500?

C93200 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while C95500 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C93200 or C95500?

C93200. Its machinability rates very good (78/100) against fair (40/100) for C95500; for welding the order is C95500 first (good, 60/100) then C93200 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C93200 and C95500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.