FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84400 vs C93200

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84400 and C93200 are both copper alloy grades. C93200 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400, about 14% more. In exchange, C84400 is the more ductile: elongation 26% versus 20% for C93200, and C93200 is harder (65 HB vs 55 HB). C93200 is stiffer (100 GPa vs 95 GPa) and C93200 runs hotter in service (230°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, C84400 machines more easily (excellent vs very good) and C93200 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than C84400 (specialty, $$$$$).

C84400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C93200Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C84400 vs C93200: properties

C84400C93200

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
100 GPa14.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

36 GPa5.2 Msi
37 GPa5.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

110 MPa16 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

26%
20%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
—

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
11 J8.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
65 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

25 HRB
24 HRB

Reduction in Area

—
16%

Hardness, Vickers

—
68 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.93 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
854°C1,569 °F

Liquidus Temperature

954°C1,749 °F
949°C1,740 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
59 W/m·K34.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
190 J/g81.7 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
230°C446 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16.4 % IACS
12 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.05×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.13 µΩ·in
1.44×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.67 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
62 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.28 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
78 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

90%
130%

Weldability

20 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
8 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
88 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

42 MJ/kg18,057 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 85%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.8 MN·m/kg
11.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

64 kJ/m³
78 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

21.7 mm²/s
17.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
8

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 27 kN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84400C93200

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84400C93200
Casting & forging—Yes
Default conditionAs CastAs Cast
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 9 finishes: Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Gold Plating, Nickel Plating, Painting, Silver Plating, Tin Plating.

C84400 vs C93200 — frequently asked

Is C93200 stronger than C84400?

Yes. C93200 has a typical yield strength of 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for C84400 — about 14% more. Tensile strength is 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C84400 or C93200?

C93200 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while C84400 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C84400 or C93200?

C84400. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (78/100) for C93200; for welding the order is C84400 first (poor, 20/100) then C93200 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84400 and C93200 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.