FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C92800 vs C95500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C92800 and C95500 are both copper alloy grades. C95500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 179 MPa (26 ksi) for C92800, about 68% more; tensile strength follows at 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 276 MPa (40 ksi). C95500 is the more ductile: elongation 8% versus 1% for C92800, and C95500 is harder (192 HB vs 85 HB). C95500 is lighter (7.53 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C92800) and C95500 is stiffer (110 GPa vs 103 GPa). On the shop floor, C92800 machines more easily (very good vs fair), C95500 welds better (good vs not recommended), and C92800 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C95500 (specialty, $$$$$).

C92800Choose it when the part is machined in volume, or when cost is the deciding factor.

C95500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C92800 vs C95500: properties

C92800C95500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

103 GPa14.9 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

39 GPa5.7 Msi
42 GPa6.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

103 GPa14.9 Msi
102 GPa14.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

276 MPa40 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

179 MPa26 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

1%
8%

Reduction in Area

1%
—

Compressive Strength

550 MPa79.8 ksi
—

Shear Strength

205 MPa29.7 ksi
425 MPa61.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

3 J2.2 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
192 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

45 HRB
92 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

89 HV
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

830°C1,526 °F
1,054°C1,929 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,000°C1,832 °F
1,064°C1,947 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

47 W/m·K27.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

230°C446 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

11 % IACS
8.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.57×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.18 µΩ·in
2.03×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.99 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.31 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

70%
50%

Weldability

10 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
15 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Castability 75 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

50%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

31 kN·m/kg
93 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

11.7 MN·m/kg
14.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

156 kJ/m³
409 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

14.2 mm²/s
13.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC95500C92800

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC92800C95500
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—As Cast
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C92800 vs C95500 — frequently asked

Is C95500 stronger than C92800?

Yes. C95500 has a typical yield strength of 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 179 MPa (26 ksi) for C92800 — about 68% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 276 MPa (40 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C92800 or C95500?

C92800 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C95500 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C92800 or C95500?

C92800. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against fair (40/100) for C95500; for welding the order is C95500 first (good, 60/100) then C92800 (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C92800 and C95500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.