FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C92200 vs C95500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C92200 and C95500 are both copper alloy grades. C95500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 138 MPa (20 ksi) for C92200, about 117% more; tensile strength follows at 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 276 MPa (40 ksi). In exchange, C92200 is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 8% for C95500, and C95500 is harder (192 HB vs 65 HB). C95500 is lighter (7.53 g/cm³ vs 8.64 g/cm³ for C92200) and C95500 is stiffer (110 GPa vs 100 GPa). On the shop floor, C92200 machines more easily (50 vs 40 out of 100), C95500 welds better (good vs poor), and C92200 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C95500 (specialty, $$$$$).

C92200Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C95500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C92200 vs C95500: properties

C92200C95500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

100 GPa14.5 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

37 GPa5.4 Msi
42 GPa6.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

104 GPa15.1 Msi
102 GPa14.8 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

276 MPa40 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

138 MPa20 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

30%
8%

Reduction in Area

25%
—

Compressive Strength

345 MPa50 ksi
—

Shear Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
425 MPa61.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

97 MPa14.1 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

16 J11.8 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

65 HB
192 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

28 HRB
92 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

68 HV
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.64 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

825°C1,517 °F
1,054°C1,929 °F

Liquidus Temperature

990°C1,814 °F
1,064°C1,947 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

41 W/m·K23.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

180 J/g77.4 BTU/lb
210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

260°C500 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

14.3 % IACS
8.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.21×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.76 µΩ·in
2.03×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.99 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.31 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

42%
50%

Weldability

25 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

85 / 100
75 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 15 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

75%
40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

32 kN·m/kg
93 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

11.6 MN·m/kg
14.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

95 kJ/m³
409 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

12.6 mm²/s
13.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC95500C92200

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC92200C95500
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—As Cast
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C92200 vs C95500 — frequently asked

Is C95500 stronger than C92200?

Yes. C95500 has a typical yield strength of 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) against 138 MPa (20 ksi) for C92200 — about 117% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 276 MPa (40 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C92200 or C95500?

C92200 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C95500 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C92200 or C95500?

C92200, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 40/100 for C95500; for welding the order is C95500 first (good, 60/100) then C92200 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C92200 and C95500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.