FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C86300 vs CC763S

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C86300 and CC763S are both copper alloy grades. C86300 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for CC763S, about 57% more; tensile strength follows at 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 640 MPa (92.8 ksi). C86300 is harder — 225 HB against 150 HB for CC763S — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. C86300 is lighter (7.65 g/cm³ vs 7.9 g/cm³ for CC763S) and CC763S conducts heat better (60 W/m·K vs 36 W/m·K). On the shop floor, CC763S machines more easily (fair vs poor) and CC763S sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than C86300 (specialty, $$$$$).

C86300Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

CC763SChoose it when the part is machined in volume, or when cost is the deciding factor.

C86300 vs CC763S: properties

C86300CC763S

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

103 GPa14.9 Msi
102 GPa14.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

107 GPa15.5 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

820 MPa119 ksi
640 MPa92.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
14%

Compressive Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Shear Strength

540 MPa78.3 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

225 HB
150 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

96 HRB
80 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
158 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 39 GPa5.7 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Reduction in Area 18% · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

862°C1,584 °F
880°C1,616 °F

Liquidus Temperature

924°C1,695 °F
910°C1,670 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
60 W/m·K34.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

19.3 µm/m·K10.7 µin/in·°F
20.5 µm/m·K11.4 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8 % IACS
12 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.16×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.5 µΩ·in
1.45×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.71 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.3 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

25%
30%

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
20 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 30 / 100 · Castability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
48 MJ/kg20,636 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

107 kN·m/kg
81 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.5 MN·m/kg
12.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,072 kJ/m³
441 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

12.5 mm²/s
20 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

15
18

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC86300CC763S

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC86300CC763S
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C86300 vs CC763S — frequently asked

Is C86300 stronger than CC763S?

Yes. C86300 has a typical yield strength of 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for CC763S — about 57% more. Tensile strength is 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 640 MPa (92.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C86300 or CC763S?

CC763S is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while C86300 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C86300 or CC763S?

CC763S. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (25/100) for C86300.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C86300 and CC763S side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.