FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C83600 vs C86300

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C83600 and C86300 are both copper alloy grades. C86300 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 117 MPa (17 ksi) for C83600, about 4.0 times as much; tensile strength follows at 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 255 MPa (37 ksi). In exchange, C83600 is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 15% for C86300, and C86300 is harder (225 HB vs 60 HB). C86300 is lighter (7.65 g/cm³ vs 8.83 g/cm³ for C83600) and C86300 is stiffer (103 GPa vs 83 GPa). On the shop floor, C83600 machines more easily (very good vs poor), C86300 welds better (30 vs 20 out of 100), and C83600 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C86300 (specialty, $$$$$).

C83600Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C86300Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C83600 vs C86300: properties

C83600C86300

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

83 GPa12 Msi
103 GPa14.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

31 GPa4.5 Msi
39 GPa5.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

100 GPa14.5 Msi
107 GPa15.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

255 MPa37 ksi
820 MPa119 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

117 MPa17 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

30%
15%

Compressive Strength

240 MPa34.8 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Shear Strength

207 MPa30 ksi
540 MPa78.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

83 MPa12 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

14 J10.3 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

60 HB
225 HB

Reduction in Area

—
18%

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
96 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.83 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

854°C1,569 °F
862°C1,584 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,010°C1,850 °F
924°C1,695 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
19.3 µm/m·K10.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

185 J/g79.5 BTU/lb
175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

15 % IACS
8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in
2.16×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.3 V

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

84 / 100
25 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

210%
25%

Weldability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Castability

92 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

82 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

—
15 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

50 MJ/kg21,496 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

280 L/kg33.6 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
70%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

29 kN·m/kg
107 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

9.4 MN·m/kg
13.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

82 kJ/m³
1,072 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

21.6 mm²/s
12.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
15

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC86300C83600

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC83600C86300
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—As Cast
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C83600 vs C86300 — frequently asked

Is C86300 stronger than C83600?

Yes. C86300 has a typical yield strength of 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 117 MPa (17 ksi) for C83600 — about 4.0 times as much. Tensile strength is 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 255 MPa (37 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C83600 or C86300?

C83600 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C86300 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C83600 or C86300?

C83600. Its machinability rates very good (84/100) against poor (25/100) for C86300; for welding the order is C86300 first (poor, 30/100) then C83600 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C83600 and C86300 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.