FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84500 vs C86300

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84500 and C86300 are both copper alloy grades. C86300 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 103 MPa (14.9 ksi) for C84500, about 4.6 times as much; tensile strength follows at 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 241 MPa (35 ksi). In exchange, C84500 is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 15% for C86300, and C86300 is harder (225 HB vs 55 HB). C86300 is lighter (7.65 g/cm³ vs 8.58 g/cm³ for C84500) and C86300 is stiffer (103 GPa vs 90 GPa). On the shop floor, C84500 machines more easily (excellent vs poor), C86300 welds better (30 vs 20 out of 100), and C84500 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C86300 (specialty, $$$$$).

C84500Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C86300Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C84500 vs C86300: properties

C84500C86300

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

90 GPa13.1 Msi
103 GPa14.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

34 GPa4.9 Msi
39 GPa5.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

95 GPa13.8 Msi
107 GPa15.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

241 MPa35 ksi
820 MPa119 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

103 MPa14.9 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

28%
15%

Reduction in Area

20%
18%

Shear Strength

172 MPa24.9 ksi
540 MPa78.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

14 J10.3 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
225 HB

Hardness, Vickers

58 HV
—

Compressive Strength

—
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
96 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.58 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
862°C1,584 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,004°C1,839 °F
924°C1,695 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.3 µm/m·K11.3 µin/in·°F
19.3 µm/m·K10.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16 % IACS
8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.08×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.25 µΩ·in
2.16×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.3 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
25 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

80%
25%

Weldability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 15 / 100 · Castability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

52 MJ/kg22,356 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
70%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

28 kN·m/kg
107 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.5 MN·m/kg
13.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

59 kJ/m³
1,072 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

22.3 mm²/s
12.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
15

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC86300C84500

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84500C86300
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—As Cast
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84500 vs C86300 — frequently asked

Is C86300 stronger than C84500?

Yes. C86300 has a typical yield strength of 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 103 MPa (14.9 ksi) for C84500 — about 4.6 times as much. Tensile strength is 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 241 MPa (35 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C84500 or C86300?

C84500 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C86300 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C84500 or C86300?

C84500. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against poor (25/100) for C86300; for welding the order is C86300 first (poor, 30/100) then C84500 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84500 and C86300 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.