FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C86300 vs CC753S

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C86300 and CC753S are both copper alloy grades. C86300 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) for CC753S, about 3.1 times as much; tensile strength follows at 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 320 MPa (46.4 ksi). In exchange, CC753S is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 15% for C86300, and C86300 is harder (225 HB vs 80 HB). C86300 is lighter (7.65 g/cm³ vs 8.4 g/cm³ for CC753S) and C86300 is stiffer (103 GPa vs 95 GPa). On the shop floor, CC753S machines more easily (very good vs poor) and CC753S sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than C86300 (specialty, $$$$$).

C86300Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

CC753SChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C86300 vs CC753S: properties

C86300CC753S

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

103 GPa14.9 Msi
95 GPa13.8 Msi

Shear Modulus

39 GPa5.7 Msi
36 GPa5.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

107 GPa15.5 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

820 MPa119 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
18%

Reduction in Area

18%
20%

Compressive Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Shear Strength

540 MPa78.3 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

225 HB
80 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

96 HRB
45 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
85 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
8.4 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

862°C1,584 °F
880°C1,616 °F

Liquidus Temperature

924°C1,695 °F
905°C1,661 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
100 W/m·K57.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

19.3 µm/m·K10.7 µin/in·°F
21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb
170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8 % IACS
20 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.16×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.5 µΩ·in
8.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m3.39 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.3 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
80 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

25%
70%

Weldability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 15 / 100 · Castability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
80%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

107 kN·m/kg
38 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.5 MN·m/kg
11.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,072 kJ/m³
118 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

12.5 mm²/s
31.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

15
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC86300CC753S

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC86300CC753S
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C86300 vs CC753S — frequently asked

Is C86300 stronger than CC753S?

Yes. C86300 has a typical yield strength of 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) for CC753S — about 3.1 times as much. Tensile strength is 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 320 MPa (46.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C86300 or CC753S?

CC753S is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while C86300 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C86300 or CC753S?

CC753S. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against poor (25/100) for C86300; for welding the order is C86300 first (poor, 30/100) then CC753S (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C86300 and CC753S side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.