FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C86300 vs C87500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C86300 and C87500 are both copper alloy grades. C86300 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 225 MPa (32.6 ksi) for C87500, about 109% more; tensile strength follows at 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 440 MPa (63.8 ksi). In exchange, C87500 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 15% for C86300, and C86300 is harder (225 HB vs 100 HB). C86300 is lighter (7.65 g/cm³ vs 8.28 g/cm³ for C87500) and C86300 conducts heat better (36 W/m·K vs 27.7 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C87500 machines more easily (fair vs poor), C87500 welds better (good vs poor), and C87500 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C86300 (specialty, $$$$$).

C86300Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C87500Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C86300 vs C87500: properties

C86300C87500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

103 GPa14.9 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

39 GPa5.7 Msi
40 GPa5.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

107 GPa15.5 Msi
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

820 MPa119 ksi
440 MPa63.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

470 MPa68.2 ksi
225 MPa32.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
18%

Reduction in Area

18%
20%

Compressive Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Shear Strength

540 MPa78.3 ksi
285 MPa41.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
135 MPa19.6 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

225 HB
100 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

96 HRB
57 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
105 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
8.28 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

862°C1,584 °F
821°C1,510 °F

Liquidus Temperature

924°C1,695 °F
902°C1,656 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
27.7 W/m·K16 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

19.3 µm/m·K10.7 µin/in·°F
18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb
190 J/g81.7 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8 % IACS
6.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.16×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.5 µΩ·in
2.57×10⁻⁷ Ω·m10.1 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.3 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

25%
45%

Weldability

30 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
12 / 100

Castability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

25 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
60%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

107 kN·m/kg
53 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.5 MN·m/kg
12.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,072 kJ/m³
241 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

12.5 mm²/s
8.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

15
6

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC86300C87500

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC86300C87500
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C86300 vs C87500 — frequently asked

Is C86300 stronger than C87500?

Yes. C86300 has a typical yield strength of 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 225 MPa (32.6 ksi) for C87500 — about 109% more. Tensile strength is 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 440 MPa (63.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C86300 or C87500?

C87500 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C86300 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, C86300 or C87500?

C87500. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (25/100) for C86300; for welding the order is C87500 first (good, 65/100) then C86300 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C86300 and C87500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.