FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C83400 vs C87500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C83400 and C87500 are both copper alloy grades. C87500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 225 MPa (32.6 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C83400, about 3.3 times as much; tensile strength follows at 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi). In exchange, C83400 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 18% for C87500, and C87500 is harder (100 HB vs 50 HB). C87500 is lighter (8.28 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for C83400) and C87500 is stiffer (105 GPa vs 96.5 GPa). On the shop floor, C83400 machines more easily (good vs fair) and C87500 welds better (good vs fair).

C83400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C87500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C83400 vs C87500: properties

C83400C87500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

96.5 GPa14 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

37 GPa5.4 Msi
40 GPa5.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

234 MPa33.9 ksi
440 MPa63.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

69 MPa10 ksi
225 MPa32.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
18%

Reduction in Area

30%
20%

Shear Strength

165 MPa23.9 ksi
285 MPa41.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
135 MPa19.6 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

50 HB
100 HB

Hardness, Vickers

53 HV
105 HV

Compressive Strength

—
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
57 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.28 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,010°C1,850 °F
821°C1,510 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,055°C1,931 °F
902°C1,656 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

159 W/m·K91.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
27.7 W/m·K16 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

376 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18.4 µm/m·K10.2 µin/in·°F
18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
190 J/g81.7 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

32 % IACS
6.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.39×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.12 µΩ·in
2.57×10⁻⁷ Ω·m10.1 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

58 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

65%
45%

Weldability

45 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
12 / 100

Castability

72 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

80%
60%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
53 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

11 MN·m/kg
12.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

25 kJ/m³
241 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

48.1 mm²/s
8.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

21
6

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC83400C87500

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC83400C87500
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C83400 vs C87500 — frequently asked

Is C87500 stronger than C83400?

Yes. C87500 has a typical yield strength of 225 MPa (32.6 ksi) against 69 MPa (10 ksi) for C83400 — about 3.3 times as much. Tensile strength is 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) vs 234 MPa (33.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C83400 or C87500?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C83400 or C87500?

C83400. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against fair (45/100) for C87500; for welding the order is C87500 first (good, 65/100) then C83400 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C83400 and C87500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.