FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C84800 vs CC495K

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C84800 and CC495K are both copper alloy grades. CC495K is the stronger of the two: yield strength 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for C84800, about 13% more. In exchange, C84800 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 10% for CC495K, and CC495K is harder (75 HB vs 55 HB). C84800 is lighter (8.55 g/cm³ vs 8.9 g/cm³ for CC495K) and C84800 is stiffer (86 GPa vs 76 GPa). On the shop floor, C84800 welds better (poor vs not recommended) and CC495K sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84800 (specialty, $$$$$).

C84800Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

CC495KChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C84800 vs CC495K: properties

C84800CC495K

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

86 GPa12.5 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Shear Modulus

32 GPa4.6 Msi
28 GPa4.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

262 MPa38 ksi
270 MPa39.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

124 MPa18 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
10%

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

76 MPa11 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

55 HB
75 HB

Compressive Strength

—
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
8 J5.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
32 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
80 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Shear Strength 190 MPa27.6 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.55 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
8.9 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

843°C1,549 °F
762°C1,404 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,010°C1,850 °F
930°C1,706 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
47 W/m·K27.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
251 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
250°C482 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16 % IACS
10 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.08×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.25 µΩ·in
1.72×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.77 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.25 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
56 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

88 / 100
85 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

90 / 100
88 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
80%

Formability (cold)

—
10 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

85%
70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

31 kN·m/kg
30 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.1 MN·m/kg
8.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

89 kJ/m³
129 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

22.3 mm²/s
21 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84800CC495K

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC84800CC495K
CNC machiningYes—
Default conditionAs Cast—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C84800 vs CC495K — frequently asked

Is CC495K stronger than C84800?

Yes. CC495K has a typical yield strength of 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for C84800 — about 13% more. Tensile strength is 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C84800 or CC495K?

CC495K is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84800 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, C84800 or CC495K?

C84800. Its weldability rates poor (20/100) against not recommended (10/100) for CC495K.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C84800 and CC495K side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.