FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C74400 vs C77600

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C74400 and C77600 are both copper alloy grades. C77600 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) for C74400, about 7% more; tensile strength follows at 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) vs 515 MPa (74.7 ksi). In exchange, C74400 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 10% for C77600, and C77600 is harder (150 HB vs 138 HB). C74400 conducts heat better (45 W/m·K vs 30 W/m·K).

C74400Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C77600Choose it when strength drives the design.

C74400 vs C77600: properties

C74400C77600

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

124 GPa18 Msi
125 GPa18.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

46 GPa6.7 Msi
47 GPa6.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

130 GPa18.9 Msi
120 GPa17.4 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

515 MPa74.7 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

440 MPa63.8 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
10%

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

138 HB
150 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

75 HRB
80 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

145 HV
160 HV

Reduction in Area

—
22%

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
28 J20.7 ft·lbf

Same in both: Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 200 MPa29 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,020°C1,868 °F
1,030°C1,886 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,065°C1,949 °F
1,080°C1,976 °F

Same in both: Density 8.7 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F
30 W/m·K17.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
190°C374 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 200 J/g86 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.8 % IACS
5.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.76×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.93 µΩ·in
3.13×10⁻⁷ Ω·m12.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.2 V
-0.27 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
28 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
25%

Weldability

52 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
62 / 100

Polishability

90 / 100
88 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
40%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
63 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

14.3 MN·m/kg
14.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

781 kJ/m³
884 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.7 mm²/s
9.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC74400C77600

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC74400C77600
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C74400 vs C77600 — frequently asked

Is C77600 stronger than C74400?

Yes. C77600 has a typical yield strength of 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) for C74400 — about 7% more. Tensile strength is 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) vs 515 MPa (74.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C74400 or C77600?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose C74400 over C77600?

Pick C74400 when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded. Pick C77600 when strength drives the design.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C74400 and C77600 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.