FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C68100 vs ERCu

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C68100 and ERCu are both copper alloy grades. C68100 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for ERCu, about 138% more; tensile strength follows at 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) vs 225 MPa (32.6 ksi). In exchange, ERCu is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 25% for C68100, and C68100 is harder (105 HB vs 55 HB). C68100 is lighter (8.4 g/cm³ vs 8.9 g/cm³ for ERCu) and ERCu is stiffer (115 GPa vs 100 GPa). On the shop floor, C68100 machines more easily (fair vs poor).

C68100Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

ERCuChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

C68100 vs ERCu: properties

C68100ERCu

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

100 GPa14.5 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

38 GPa5.5 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
140 GPa20.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

415 MPa60.2 ksi
225 MPa32.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

190 MPa27.6 ksi
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
35%

Reduction in Area

35%
60%

Shear Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

30 J22.1 ft·lbf
70 J51.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

105 HB
55 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

62 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

110 HV
58 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.4 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³
8.9 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

866°C1,591 °F
1,065°C1,949 °F

Liquidus Temperature

888°C1,630 °F
1,080°C1,976 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

120 W/m·K69.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
250 W/m·K144 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

21 µm/m·K11.7 µin/in·°F
17.7 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb
205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
250°C482 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

25 % IACS
40 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.72 µΩ·in
4.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.28 V
-0.3 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
20%

Weldability

80 / 100
78 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
92 / 100

Castability

70 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
92 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
78 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
3.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

49 kN·m/kg
25 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

11.9 MN·m/kg
12.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

181 kJ/m³
28 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

37.6 mm²/s
73 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
28

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleERCuC68100

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC68100ERCu
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C68100 vs ERCu — frequently asked

Is C68100 stronger than ERCu?

Yes. C68100 has a typical yield strength of 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) against 80 MPa (11.6 ksi) for ERCu — about 138% more. Tensile strength is 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) vs 225 MPa (32.6 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C68100 or ERCu?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C68100 or ERCu?

C68100. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (30/100) for ERCu.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C68100 and ERCu side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.