FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C65600 vs ERCuAl-A3

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C65600 and ERCuAl-A3 are both copper alloy grades. ERCuAl-A3 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 345 MPa (50 ksi) against 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) for C65600, about 82% more; tensile strength follows at 690 MPa (100 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi). In exchange, C65600 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 8% for ERCuAl-A3, and ERCuAl-A3 is harder (210 HB vs 85 HB). ERCuAl-A3 is lighter (7.5 g/cm³ vs 8.53 g/cm³ for C65600) and ERCuAl-A3 is stiffer (115 GPa vs 103 GPa). On the shop floor, C65600 welds better (excellent vs good).

C65600Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

ERCuAl-A3Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C65600 vs ERCuAl-A3: properties

C65600ERCuAl-A3

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

103 GPa14.9 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

38.5 GPa5.6 Msi
44 GPa6.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

107 GPa15.5 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

190 MPa27.6 ksi
345 MPa50 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
8%

Shear Strength

235 MPa34.1 ksi
410 MPa59.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

145 MPa21 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
14 J10.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
210 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

50 HRB
—

Reduction in Area

—
10%

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
20 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

—
220 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.53 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³
7.5 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

970°C1,778 °F
1,030°C1,886 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,025°C1,877 °F
1,050°C1,922 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
46 W/m·K26.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
400 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F
16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb
210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7 % IACS
9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.46×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.69 µΩ·in
1.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.48 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.26 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
74 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
28 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
20%

Weldability

92 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

88 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

78 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
92 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

12.1 MN·m/kg
15.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

175 kJ/m³
518 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.2 mm²/s
15.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleERCuAl-A3C65600

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC65600ERCuAl-A3
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C65600 vs ERCuAl-A3 — frequently asked

Is ERCuAl-A3 stronger than C65600?

Yes. ERCuAl-A3 has a typical yield strength of 345 MPa (50 ksi) against 190 MPa (27.6 ksi) for C65600 — about 82% more. Tensile strength is 690 MPa (100 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C65600 or ERCuAl-A3?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, C65600 or ERCuAl-A3?

C65600. Its weldability rates excellent (92/100) against good (60/100) for ERCuAl-A3.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C65600 and ERCuAl-A3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.