FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C51000 vs C51900

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C51000 and C51900 are both copper alloy grades, both spring cu alloy. C51900 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for C51000, about 3.2 times as much; tensile strength follows at 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) vs 340 MPa (49.3 ksi). In exchange, C51000 is the more ductile: elongation 60% versus 20% for C51900, and C51900 is harder (155 HB vs 80 HB).

C51000Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

C51900Choose it when strength drives the design.

C51000 vs C51900: properties

C51000C51900

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
115 GPa16.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

41 GPa5.9 Msi
43 GPa6.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
120 GPa17.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

340 MPa49.3 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

140 MPa20.3 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

60%
20%

Shear Strength

235 MPa34.1 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

150 MPa21.8 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

80 HB
155 HB

Hardness, Vickers

85 HV
165 HV

Reduction in Area

—
35%

Compressive Strength

—
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
78 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.86 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

954°C1,749 °F
910°C1,670 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,049°C1,920 °F
1,040°C1,904 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

69 W/m·K39.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
67 W/m·K38.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.8 µm/m·K9.9 µin/in·°F
18.5 µm/m·K10.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

200 J/g86 BTU/lb
175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 15 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.3 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

30 / 100
—

Polishability

75 / 100
80 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 25 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Weldability 45 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 90 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

68 MJ/kg29,235 BTU/lb
62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.3 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
320 L/kg38.3 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

38 kN·m/kg
59 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

12.4 MN·m/kg
13.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

89 kJ/m³
880 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

20.5 mm²/s
20.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC51000C51900

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC51000C51900
Default conditionO—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 9 finishes: Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Gold Plating, Nickel Plating, Painting, Silver Plating, Tin Plating.

C51000 vs C51900 — frequently asked

Is C51900 stronger than C51000?

Yes. C51900 has a typical yield strength of 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for C51000 — about 3.2 times as much. Tensile strength is 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) vs 340 MPa (49.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C51000 or C51900?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose C51000 over C51900?

Pick C51000 when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded. Pick C51900 when strength drives the design.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C51000 and C51900 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.