FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C51000 vs C52400

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C51000 and C52400 are both copper alloy grades, both spring cu alloy. C52400 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for C51000, about 4.2 times as much; tensile strength follows at 690 MPa (100 ksi) vs 340 MPa (49.3 ksi). In exchange, C51000 is the more ductile: elongation 60% versus 15% for C52400, and C52400 is harder (180 HB vs 80 HB). C51000 conducts heat better (69 W/m·K vs 50 W/m·K). On the shop floor, C51000 welds better (45 vs 35 out of 100).

C51000Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

C52400Choose it when strength drives the design.

C51000 vs C52400: properties

C51000C52400

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

340 MPa49.3 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

140 MPa20.3 ksi
585 MPa84.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

60%
15%

Shear Strength

235 MPa34.1 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

150 MPa21.8 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

80 HB
180 HB

Hardness, Vickers

85 HV
190 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
89 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 110 GPa16 Msi · Shear Modulus 41 GPa5.9 Msi · Bulk Modulus 115 GPa16.7 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.86 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.78 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

954°C1,749 °F
843°C1,549 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,049°C1,920 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

69 W/m·K39.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.8 µm/m·K9.9 µin/in·°F
18.4 µm/m·K10.2 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 200 J/g86 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

15 % IACS
11 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in
1.57×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.18 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.3 V
-0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
22 / 100

Weldability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

30 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
88 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
78 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

68 MJ/kg29,235 BTU/lb
72 MJ/kg30,954 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.3 kg CO₂/kg
5.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

38 kN·m/kg
79 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

12.4 MN·m/kg
12.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

89 kJ/m³
1,556 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

20.5 mm²/s
15 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC51000C52400

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC51000C52400
Default conditionO—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 9 finishes: Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Gold Plating, Nickel Plating, Painting, Silver Plating, Tin Plating.

C51000 vs C52400 — frequently asked

Is C52400 stronger than C51000?

Yes. C52400 has a typical yield strength of 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for C51000 — about 4.2 times as much. Tensile strength is 690 MPa (100 ksi) vs 340 MPa (49.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C51000 or C52400?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, C51000 or C52400?

C51000. Its weldability rates fair (45/100) against fair (35/100) for C52400.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C51000 and C52400 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.