FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C51000 vs C65500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C51000 and C65500 are both copper alloy grades. C65500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for C51000, about 18% more; tensile strength follows at 400 MPa (58 ksi) vs 340 MPa (49.3 ksi). C65500 is lighter (8.53 g/cm³ vs 8.86 g/cm³ for C51000) and C51000 is stiffer (110 GPa vs 103 GPa). On the shop floor, C65500 welds better (excellent vs fair).

C65500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C51000 vs C65500: properties

C51000C65500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
103 GPa14.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

41 GPa5.9 Msi
38.6 GPa5.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

340 MPa49.3 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

140 MPa20.3 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Shear Strength

235 MPa34.1 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

80 HB
78 HB

Hardness, Vickers

85 HV
—

Reduction in Area

—
55%

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
80 J59 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
40 HRB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 115 GPa16.7 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34 · Elongation at Break 60% · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 150 MPa21.8 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.86 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.53 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

954°C1,749 °F
971°C1,780 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,049°C1,920 °F
1,019°C1,866 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

69 W/m·K39.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
36 W/m·K20.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

380 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.8 µm/m·K9.9 µin/in·°F
18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

200 J/g86 BTU/lb
210 J/g90.3 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

15 % IACS
7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.15×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.53 µΩ·in
2.46×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.69 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.3 V
-0.27 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
28 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
30%

Weldability

45 / 100
92 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
92 / 100

Castability

30 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

68 MJ/kg29,235 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.3 kg CO₂/kg
4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

38 kN·m/kg
47 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

12.4 MN·m/kg
12.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

89 kJ/m³
132 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

20.5 mm²/s
11.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC51000C65500

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC51000C65500
Default conditionOO
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 9 finishes: Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Gold Plating, Nickel Plating, Painting, Silver Plating, Tin Plating.

C51000 vs C65500 — frequently asked

Is C65500 stronger than C51000?

Yes. C65500 has a typical yield strength of 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 140 MPa (20.3 ksi) for C51000 — about 18% more. Tensile strength is 400 MPa (58 ksi) vs 340 MPa (49.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C51000 or C65500?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, C51000 or C65500?

C65500. Its weldability rates excellent (92/100) against fair (45/100) for C51000.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C51000 and C65500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.