FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C14500 vs M2

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C14500 and M2 are both copper alloy grades. C14500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for M2, about 3.9 times as much; tensile strength follows at 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 220 MPa (31.9 ksi). In exchange, M2 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 18% for C14500, and C14500 is harder (85 HB vs 45 HB). C14500 is stiffer (117 GPa vs 110 GPa). On the shop floor, C14500 machines more easily (excellent vs poor) and M2 welds better (fair vs poor).

C14500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

M2Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

C14500 vs M2: properties

C14500M2

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

117 GPa17 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
45 GPa6.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
45%

Shear Strength

195 MPa28.3 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

95 MPa13.8 ksi
78 MPa11.3 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

85 HB
45 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

40 HRB
—

Reduction in Area

—
72%

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Vickers

—
50 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 140 GPa20.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.9 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,051°C1,924 °F
1,065°C1,949 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,065°C1,949 °F
1,083°C1,981 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

350 W/m·K202 BTU/hr·ft·°F
388 W/m·K224 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.6 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F
17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-253°C-423 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

92 % IACS
97 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.87×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.736 µΩ·in
1.78×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.701 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

65 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.2 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

25 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
95 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
20%

Castability

—
40 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 90 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
3.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

35 kN·m/kg
25 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.1 MN·m/kg
12.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

323 kJ/m³
22 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

101.7 mm²/s
113.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

53
46

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC14500M2

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC14500M2
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionH02—
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
Chrome PlatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C14500 vs M2 — frequently asked

Is C14500 stronger than M2?

Yes. C14500 has a typical yield strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) for M2 — about 3.9 times as much. Tensile strength is 310 MPa (45 ksi) vs 220 MPa (31.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C14500 or M2?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C14500 or M2?

C14500. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against poor (30/100) for M2; for welding the order is M2 first (fair, 40/100) then C14500 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C14500 and M2 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.