FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C11100 vs C14500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C11100 and C14500 are both copper alloy grades. C11100 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for C14500, about 24% more; tensile strength follows at 400 MPa (58 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). In exchange, C14500 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 3% for C11100, and C11100 is harder (100 HB vs 85 HB). C11100 runs hotter in service (250°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, C14500 machines more easily (excellent vs poor).

C11100Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

C14500Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C11100 vs C14500: properties

C11100C14500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

400 MPa58 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

340 MPa49.3 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
18%

Shear Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

100 HB
85 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

42 HRB
40 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 117 GPa17 Msi · Shear Modulus 44 GPa6.4 Msi · Bulk Modulus 140 GPa20.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,065°C1,949 °F
1,051°C1,924 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,083°C1,981 °F
1,065°C1,949 °F

Same in both: Density 8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

385 W/m·K222 BTU/hr·ft·°F
350 W/m·K202 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.7 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F
17.6 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-250°C-418 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

97 % IACS
92 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.78×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.701 µΩ·in
1.87×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.736 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.22 V
-0.2 V

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
65 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
85 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
—

Weldability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

30 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

95 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.5 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

150 L/kg18 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
35%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

45 kN·m/kg
35 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

494 kJ/m³
323 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

111.9 mm²/s
101.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

74
53

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 13.1 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC14500C11100

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC11100C14500
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—H02
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C11100 vs C14500 — frequently asked

Is C11100 stronger than C14500?

Yes. C11100 has a typical yield strength of 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for C14500 — about 24% more. Tensile strength is 400 MPa (58 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C11100 or C14500?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C11100 or C14500?

C14500. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against poor (30/100) for C11100; for welding the order is C11100 first (poor, 30/100) then C14500 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C11100 and C14500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.