FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy C11300 vs C14500

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy C11300 and C14500 are both copper alloy grades. C11300 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for C14500, about 13% more; tensile strength follows at 345 MPa (50 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). In exchange, C14500 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 6% for C11300, and C11300 is harder (100 HB vs 85 HB). On the shop floor, C14500 machines more easily (excellent vs poor) and C11300 welds better (fair vs poor).

C11300Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

C14500Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C11300 vs C14500: properties

C11300C14500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

345 MPa50 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

310 MPa45 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

6%
18%

Reduction in Area

55%
—

Shear Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

100 HB
85 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

58 HRB
40 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

108 HV
—

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 117 GPa17 Msi · Shear Modulus 44 GPa6.4 Msi · Bulk Modulus 140 GPa20.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,065°C1,949 °F
1,051°C1,924 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,083°C1,981 °F
1,065°C1,949 °F

Same in both: Density 8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

388 W/m·K224 BTU/hr·ft·°F
350 W/m·K202 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
17.6 µm/m·K9.8 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-250°C-418 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 205 J/g88.1 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

98 % IACS
92 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.76×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.693 µΩ·in
1.87×10⁻⁸ Ω·m0.736 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.22 V
-0.2 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
65 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
85 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
—

Weldability

35 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
40 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

95 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.6 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

39 kN·m/kg
35 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

411 kJ/m³
323 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

112.7 mm²/s
101.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

67
53

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 13.1 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC14500C11300

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC11300C14500
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—H02
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

C11300 vs C14500 — frequently asked

Is C11300 stronger than C14500?

Yes. C11300 has a typical yield strength of 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for C14500 — about 13% more. Tensile strength is 345 MPa (50 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C11300 or C14500?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C11300 or C14500?

C14500. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against poor (32/100) for C11300; for welding the order is C11300 first (fair, 35/100) then C14500 (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C11300 and C14500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.