FabDigitFabDigit

Copper Alloy AlBC3 vs C84800

Copper Alloy · grade comparison

Copper Alloy AlBC3 and C84800 are both copper alloy grades. AlBC3 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for C84800, about 122% more; tensile strength follows at 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi). In exchange, C84800 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 20% for AlBC3, and AlBC3 is harder (170 HB vs 55 HB). AlBC3 is lighter (7.53 g/cm³ vs 8.55 g/cm³ for C84800) and AlBC3 is stiffer (110 GPa vs 86 GPa). On the shop floor, C84800 machines more easily (excellent vs fair), AlBC3 welds better (good vs poor), and AlBC3 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C84800 (specialty, $$$$$).

AlBC3Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

C84800Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

AlBC3 vs C84800: properties

AlBC3C84800

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
86 GPa12.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

42 GPa6.1 Msi
32 GPa4.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

102 GPa14.8 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

620 MPa89.9 ksi
262 MPa38 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
124 MPa18 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
35%

Reduction in Area

20%
—

Compressive Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
—

Shear Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
76 MPa11 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

22 J16.2 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

170 HB
55 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

88 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

180 HV
—

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.53 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³
8.55 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,040°C1,904 °F
843°C1,549 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,060°C1,940 °F
1,010°C1,850 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
72 W/m·K41.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

419 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
377 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.2 µm/m·K9 µin/in·°F
18 µm/m·K10 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

220 J/g94.6 BTU/lb
170 J/g73.1 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8.5 % IACS
16 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.03×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.99 µΩ·in
1.08×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.25 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.23 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
58 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
88 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
—

Weldability

65 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
—

Castability

75 / 100
90 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

20 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

52 MJ/kg22,356 BTU/lb
45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

55%
85%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

82 kN·m/kg
31 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

14.6 MN·m/kg
10.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

344 kJ/m³
89 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13.3 mm²/s
22.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

15
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every copper alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

501002005001,0007.588.599.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC84800AlBC3

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlBC3C84800
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—As Cast
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
Chrome Plating—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Tin Plating—Yes

They share 4 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

AlBC3 vs C84800 — frequently asked

Is AlBC3 stronger than C84800?

Yes. AlBC3 has a typical yield strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 124 MPa (18 ksi) for C84800 — about 122% more. Tensile strength is 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 262 MPa (38 ksi).

Which is cheaper, AlBC3 or C84800?

AlBC3 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C84800 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, AlBC3 or C84800?

C84800. Its machinability rates excellent (88/100) against fair (35/100) for AlBC3; for welding the order is AlBC3 first (good, 65/100) then C84800 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in AlBC3 and C84800 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.