FabDigitFabDigit

IM7 vs T700S

Composite · grade comparison

IM7 and T700S are both composite grades. IM7 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 5,670 MPa (822 ksi) against 4,900 MPa (711 ksi) for T700S, about 16% more. IM7 is stiffer (276 GPa vs 230 GPa) and IM7 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous).

IM7Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

IM7 vs T700S: properties

IM7T700S

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

276 GPa40 Msi
230 GPa33.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

5,670 MPa822 ksi
4,900 MPa711 ksi

Elongation at Break

1.9%
2.1%

Compressive Strength

2,800 MPa406 ksi
1,470 MPa213 ksi

Poisson's Ratio

—
0.27

Flexural Strength

—
1,620 MPa235 ksi

Flexural Modulus

—
120 GPa17.4 Msi

Shear Strength

—
98 MPa14.2 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.78 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.8 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

5.4 W/m·K3.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
9.4 W/m·K5.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

879 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
750 J/kg·K0.18 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

-0.64 µm/m·K-0.36 µin/in·°F
-0.38 µm/m·K-0.21 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
350°C662 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

—
500°C932 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -269°C-452 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1.5×10⁻⁵ Ω·m591 µΩ·in
1.6×10⁻⁵ Ω·m630 µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

—
0 Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

90 / 100
60 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Polishability

40 / 100
—

Same in both: Machinability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

490 MJ/kg210,662 BTU/lb
400 MJ/kg171,969 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

31 kg CO₂/kg
28 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

600 L/kg71.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

3,185 kN·m/kg
2,722 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

155.1 MN·m/kg
127.8 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

3.5 mm²/s
7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

-173
-527

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityIM7T700S
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

IM7 vs T700S — frequently asked

Is IM7 stronger than T700S?

Yes. IM7 has a typical tensile strength of 5,670 MPa (822 ksi) against 4,900 MPa (711 ksi) for T700S — about 16% more.

Which is cheaper, IM7 or T700S?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose IM7 over T700S?

Pick IM7 when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in IM7 and T700S side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.