FabDigitFabDigit

6061/SiC/10p vs W75Cu25

Composite · grade comparison

6061/SiC/10p and W75Cu25 are both composite grades. W75Cu25 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) against 296 MPa (42.9 ksi) for 6061/SiC/10p, about 28% more; tensile strength follows at 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 338 MPa (49 ksi). In exchange, 6061/SiC/10p is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 5% for W75Cu25. 6061/SiC/10p is lighter (2.75 g/cm³ vs 14.8 g/cm³ for W75Cu25) and W75Cu25 is stiffer (250 GPa vs 81 GPa).

6061/SiC/10pChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

W75Cu25Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

6061/SiC/10p vs W75Cu25: properties

6061/SiC/10pW75Cu25

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

81 GPa11.7 Msi
250 GPa36.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

31 GPa4.5 Msi
96 GPa13.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

79 GPa11.5 Msi
208 GPa30.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.33
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

338 MPa49 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

296 MPa42.9 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

6%
5%

Compressive Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Compressive Modulus

82 GPa11.9 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Flexural Modulus

81 GPa11.7 Msi
—

Shear Strength

215 MPa31.2 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in
15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.75 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
14.8 g/cm³0.53 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

175 W/m·K101 BTU/hr·ft·°F
200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
195 J/kg·K0.05 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.7 µm/m·K11.5 µin/in·°F
9.5 µm/m·K5.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
400°C752 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

250°C482 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

4.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.77 µΩ·in
4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.57 µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

—
4×10⁻⁶ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
50 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

95 / 100
100 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Polishability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

225 MJ/kg96,733 BTU/lb
280 MJ/kg120,378 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13.5 kg CO₂/kg
18 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
20%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

123 kN·m/kg
42 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

29.5 MN·m/kg
16.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

541 kJ/m³
289 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

72.3 mm²/s
69.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

35
52

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale6061/SiC/10pW75Cu25

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability6061/SiC/10pW75Cu25
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

6061/SiC/10p vs W75Cu25 — frequently asked

Is W75Cu25 stronger than 6061/SiC/10p?

Yes. W75Cu25 has a typical yield strength of 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) against 296 MPa (42.9 ksi) for 6061/SiC/10p — about 28% more. Tensile strength is 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 338 MPa (49 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 6061/SiC/10p or W75Cu25?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose 6061/SiC/10p over W75Cu25?

Pick 6061/SiC/10p when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint. Pick W75Cu25 when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6061/SiC/10p and W75Cu25 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.