FabDigitFabDigit

2124/SiC/25p vs W75Cu25

Composite · grade comparison

2124/SiC/25p and W75Cu25 are both composite grades. 2124/SiC/25p is the stronger of the two: yield strength 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for W75Cu25, about 26% more. In exchange, W75Cu25 is the more ductile: elongation 5% versus 3% for 2124/SiC/25p. 2124/SiC/25p is lighter (2.88 g/cm³ vs 14.8 g/cm³ for W75Cu25) and W75Cu25 is stiffer (250 GPa vs 114 GPa). On the shop floor, W75Cu25 machines more easily (poor vs not recommended).

2124/SiC/25pChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

W75Cu25Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

2124/SiC/25p vs W75Cu25: properties

2124/SiC/25pW75Cu25

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

114 GPa16.5 Msi
250 GPa36.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

45 GPa6.5 Msi
96 GPa13.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

90 GPa13.1 Msi
208 GPa30.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

3%
5%

Compressive Strength

700 MPa102 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Compressive Modulus

116 GPa16.8 Msi
—

Flexural Modulus

114 GPa16.5 Msi
—

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Same in both: Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 620 MPa89.9 ksi · Flexural Strength 800 MPa116 ksi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.88 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
14.8 g/cm³0.53 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

140 W/m·K80.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
200 W/m·K116 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

830 J/kg·K0.2 BTU/lb·°F
195 J/kg·K0.05 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

15 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F
9.5 µm/m·K5.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
400°C752 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

300°C572 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

6.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.56 µΩ·in
4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.57 µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

—
4×10⁻⁶ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

32 / 100
50 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

95 / 100
100 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

12 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

260 MJ/kg111,780 BTU/lb
280 MJ/kg120,378 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
20%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 18 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

215 kN·m/kg
42 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

39.6 MN·m/kg
16.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,011 kJ/m³
289 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

58.6 mm²/s
69.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

51
52

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2124/SiC/25pW75Cu25

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability2124/SiC/25pW75Cu25
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

2124/SiC/25p vs W75Cu25 — frequently asked

Is 2124/SiC/25p stronger than W75Cu25?

Yes. 2124/SiC/25p has a typical yield strength of 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) for W75Cu25 — about 26% more. Tensile strength is 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 2124/SiC/25p or W75Cu25?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 2124/SiC/25p or W75Cu25?

W75Cu25. Its machinability rates poor (30/100) against not recommended (12/100) for 2124/SiC/25p.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2124/SiC/25p and W75Cu25 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.