FabDigitFabDigit

6061/SiC/10p vs A356/Al2O3/20p

Composite · grade comparison

6061/SiC/10p and A356/Al2O3/20p are both composite grades. Both yield at about 296 MPa — strength does not separate them. 6061/SiC/10p is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 0.7% for A356/Al2O3/20p. 6061/SiC/10p is lighter (2.75 g/cm³ vs 2.94 g/cm³ for A356/Al2O3/20p) and A356/Al2O3/20p is stiffer (98 GPa vs 81 GPa). On the shop floor, 6061/SiC/10p machines more easily (30 vs 20 out of 100).

6061/SiC/10pChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

A356/Al2O3/20pChoose it when the part sees heat.

6061/SiC/10p vs A356/Al2O3/20p: properties

6061/SiC/10pA356/Al2O3/20p

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

81 GPa11.7 Msi
98 GPa14.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

31 GPa4.5 Msi
38 GPa5.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

79 GPa11.5 Msi
92 GPa13.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

338 MPa49 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

296 MPa42.9 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

6%
0.7%

Compressive Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

82 GPa11.9 Msi
99 GPa14.4 Msi

Flexural Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Flexural Modulus

81 GPa11.7 Msi
97 GPa14.1 Msi

Shear Strength

215 MPa31.2 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in
15 MPa·√m13.7 ksi·√in

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.75 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.94 g/cm³0.11 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

175 W/m·K101 BTU/hr·ft·°F
130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

20.7 µm/m·K11.5 µin/in·°F
17.5 µm/m·K9.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

175°C347 °F
200°C392 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

250°C482 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

4.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.77 µΩ·in
5.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.17 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 55 / 100 · UV / Weathering Resistance 95 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
20 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

225 MJ/kg96,733 BTU/lb
210 MJ/kg90,284 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13.5 kg CO₂/kg
14 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

123 kN·m/kg
112 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

29.5 MN·m/kg
33.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

541 kJ/m³
429 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

72.3 mm²/s
50.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

35
25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every composite grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1101001,000510Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale6061/SiC/10pA356/Al2O3/20p

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability6061/SiC/10pA356/Al2O3/20p
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

6061/SiC/10p vs A356/Al2O3/20p — frequently asked

What is the difference between 6061/SiC/10p and A356/Al2O3/20p?

6061/SiC/10p and A356/Al2O3/20p are both composite grades. Both yield at about 296 MPa — strength does not separate them. 6061/SiC/10p is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 0.7% for A356/Al2O3/20p.

Which is cheaper, 6061/SiC/10p or A356/Al2O3/20p?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 6061/SiC/10p or A356/Al2O3/20p?

6061/SiC/10p, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 20/100 for A356/Al2O3/20p.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 6061/SiC/10p and A356/Al2O3/20p side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.